Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/leap.1382 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/leap.1382 34230773!8250802!34230773     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Learn+Publ 2021 ; 34 (3): 429-441 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34230773|t=2021. Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis |pdf=|usr=}}{{34230773}} gab.com Text Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis JO: Learn Publ http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34230773 #FOAvip This paper considers the pattens of international collaboration by analysing publications on COVID-19 published in the first 6 months of the pandemic. The data set comprised articles on COVID-19 indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) downloaded four times between 1 April 2020 and 1 June 2020. The analysis of 5,827 documents revealed that 128 countries, 23,127 authors, and 6,349 institutes published on the pandemic. The data reveal that the three main publishing countries were the USA, China, and England with Italy closely following. Although publication was widely spread, most of the institutions with the highest volume of output were in China. Network analysis showed growth in international cooperation with an average degree of country/region cooperation rising to 23.06 by 1 June. There was also a clear core-periphery structure to international collaboration. Institutional collaboration was shown to be highly regionalized. The data reveal a high and growing incidence of international collaboration on the pandemic. Twit Text FOAVip Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis ????Learn Publ http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34230773 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34230773 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34230773}}</ref> Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis #MMPMID34230773 Duan D; Xia Q Learn Publ 2021[Jul]; 34 (3): 429-441 PMID34230773show ga This paper considers the pattens of international collaboration by analysing publications on COVID-19 published in the first 6 months of the pandemic. The data set comprised articles on COVID-19 indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) downloaded four times between 1 April 2020 and 1 June 2020. The analysis of 5,827 documents revealed that 128 countries, 23,127 authors, and 6,349 institutes published on the pandemic. The data reveal that the three main publishing countries were the USA, China, and England with Italy closely following. Although publication was widely spread, most of the institutions with the highest volume of output were in China. Network analysis showed growth in international cooperation with an average degree of country/region cooperation rising to 23.06 by 1 June. There was also a clear core-periphery structure to international collaboration. Institutional collaboration was shown to be highly regionalized. The data reveal a high and growing incidence of international collaboration on the pandemic. äEvolution of scientific collaboration on COVID-19: A bibliometric anal(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing