Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1136/sextrans-2021-055055 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/sextrans-2021-055055 34226202!ä!34226202 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Sex+Transm+Infect 2022 ; 98 (3): 219-221 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34226202|t=2022. Safeguarding teenagers in a sexual health service during the COVID-19 pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{34226202}} gab.com Text Safeguarding teenagers in a sexual health service during the COVID-19 pandemic JO: Sex Transm Infect http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34226202 #FOAvip OBJECTIVES: The first aim was to examine how the COVID-19 restrictions on movement impacted on teenagers' access to a local sexual health service (SHS). The second aim was to audit whether safeguarding assessments were carried out for those accessing the service remotely. METHODS: April-September 2020 consultation numbers for teenagers aged 17 years and under were compared with the 2019 equivalent. Service safeguarding assessment standards were reviewed for teenagers receiving telephone consultations for the first 6 months of lockdown, April-September 2020. RESULTS: There was a reduction in contact with the service of 100% for those aged 13 years and younger, 52% for those aged 14 and 15 years and 31% for those aged 16 and 17 years for the compared months. A safeguarding assessment was either carried out by the service or accounted for by a partner community practitioner for all contacts with the service by young people 15 years or younger. 96% of safeguarding assessments were carried out for those aged 16-17 years. CONCLUSIONS: There was a reduction in consultations for all age groups examined in the 6 months following lockdown. This adds to the evidence that restrictions during lockdown are barriers to young people accessing SHSs. For those who did have a consultation, safeguarding assessments were consistently carried out. Nevertheless, due to reduced contact overall, it is likely that some safeguarding issues remain undisclosed. Multiagency safeguarding networks and telephone consultations with a low threshold for promoting an in-person consultation facilitated access to the SHS and a robust safeguarding pathway during the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic. Twit Text FOAVip Safeguarding teenagers in a sexual health service during the COVID-19 pandemic ????Sex Transm Infect http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34226202 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34226202 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34226202}}</ref> Safeguarding teenagers in a sexual health service during the COVID-19 pandemic #MMPMID34226202 Bekaert S; Azzopardi L Sex Transm Infect 2022[May]; 98 (3): 219-221 PMID34226202show ga OBJECTIVES: The first aim was to examine how the COVID-19 restrictions on movement impacted on teenagers' access to a local sexual health service (SHS). The second aim was to audit whether safeguarding assessments were carried out for those accessing the service remotely. METHODS: April-September 2020 consultation numbers for teenagers aged 17 years and under were compared with the 2019 equivalent. Service safeguarding assessment standards were reviewed for teenagers receiving telephone consultations for the first 6 months of lockdown, April-September 2020. RESULTS: There was a reduction in contact with the service of 100% for those aged 13 years and younger, 52% for those aged 14 and 15 years and 31% for those aged 16 and 17 years for the compared months. A safeguarding assessment was either carried out by the service or accounted for by a partner community practitioner for all contacts with the service by young people 15 years or younger. 96% of safeguarding assessments were carried out for those aged 16-17 years. CONCLUSIONS: There was a reduction in consultations for all age groups examined in the 6 months following lockdown. This adds to the evidence that restrictions during lockdown are barriers to young people accessing SHSs. For those who did have a consultation, safeguarding assessments were consistently carried out. Nevertheless, due to reduced contact overall, it is likely that some safeguarding issues remain undisclosed. Multiagency safeguarding networks and telephone consultations with a low threshold for promoting an in-person consultation facilitated access to the SHS and a robust safeguarding pathway during the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic. |*COVID-19/epidemiology/prevention & control[MESH] |Adolescent[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control[MESH] |Health Services[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics/prevention & control[MESH]Safeguarding teenagers in a sexual health service during the COVID-19 (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing