Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.060 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.060 34216732!8245307!34216732     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Int+J+Infect+Dis 2021 ; 109 (ä): 195-198 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34216732|t=2021. Danish citizens preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection |pdf=|usr=}}{{34216732}} gab.com Text Danish citizens preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection JO: Int J Infect Dis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34216732 #FOAvip INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 by self-collection of specimens is a reliable method compared with healthcare worker collected samples. Citizens' preferences for collection methods are unknown, but at-home collection could have several advantages. METHODS: This study investigated the preference for guided at-home self-collection versus at-hospital specimen collection by healthcare workers. RESULTS: Among the 3709 participants, at-home swab collection was the preferred setting for 2362 (63.7%) compared with 1347 (36.3%) reporting a preference for an at-hospital swabbing procedure. CONCLUSION: A high preference for guided at-home self-collection of oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimens exists and could be a future norm beyond COVID-19. Twit Text FOAVip Danish citizens preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection ????Int J Infect Dis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34216732 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34216732 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34216732}}</ref> Danish citizens preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection #MMPMID34216732 Bundgaard JS; Raaschou-Pedersen DT; Todsen T; Ringgaard A; Torp-Pedersen C; Von Buchwald C; Iversen K; Bundgaard H Int J Infect Dis 2021[Aug]; 109 (ä): 195-198 PMID34216732show ga INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 by self-collection of specimens is a reliable method compared with healthcare worker collected samples. Citizens' preferences for collection methods are unknown, but at-home collection could have several advantages. METHODS: This study investigated the preference for guided at-home self-collection versus at-hospital specimen collection by healthcare workers. RESULTS: Among the 3709 participants, at-home swab collection was the preferred setting for 2362 (63.7%) compared with 1347 (36.3%) reporting a preference for an at-hospital swabbing procedure. CONCLUSION: A high preference for guided at-home self-collection of oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimens exists and could be a future norm beyond COVID-19. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Denmark[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Oropharynx[MESH]Danish citizens preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing