Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.045 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.045 34187707!8216866!34187707     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Vaccine 2021 ; 39 (32): 4414-4418 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34187707|t=2021. Recent MMR vaccination in health care workers and Covid-19: A test negative case-control study |pdf=|usr=}}{{34187707}} gab.com Text Recent MMR vaccination in health care workers and Covid-19: A test negative case-control study JO: Vaccine http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34187707 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesised that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine may afford cross-protection against SARS-CoV-2 which may contribute to the wide variability in disease severity of Covid-19. METHODS: We employed a test negative case-control study, utilising a recent measles outbreak during which many healthcare workers received the MMR vaccine, to investigate the potential protective effect of MMR against SARS-CoV-2 in 5905 subjects (n = 805 males, n = 5100 females). RESULTS: The odds ratio for testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, in recently MMR-vaccinated compared to not recently MMR-vaccinated individuals was 0.91 (95% CI 0.76, 1.09). An interaction analysis showed a significant interaction for sex. After sex-stratification, the odds ratio for testing positive for males was 0.43 (95% CI 0.24, 0.79, P = 0.006), and 1.01 (95% CI 0.83, 1.22, P = 0.92) for females. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that there may be a protective effect of the MMR vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in males but not females. Twit Text FOAVip Recent MMR vaccination in health care workers and Covid-19: A test negative case-control study ????Vaccine http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34187707 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34187707 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34187707}}</ref> Recent MMR vaccination in health care workers and Covid-19: A test negative case-control study #MMPMID34187707 Lundberg L; Bygdell M; Stukat von Feilitzen G; Woxenius S; Ohlsson C; Kindblom JM; Leach S Vaccine 2021[Jul]; 39 (32): 4414-4418 PMID34187707show ga BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesised that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine may afford cross-protection against SARS-CoV-2 which may contribute to the wide variability in disease severity of Covid-19. METHODS: We employed a test negative case-control study, utilising a recent measles outbreak during which many healthcare workers received the MMR vaccine, to investigate the potential protective effect of MMR against SARS-CoV-2 in 5905 subjects (n = 805 males, n = 5100 females). RESULTS: The odds ratio for testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, in recently MMR-vaccinated compared to not recently MMR-vaccinated individuals was 0.91 (95% CI 0.76, 1.09). An interaction analysis showed a significant interaction for sex. After sex-stratification, the odds ratio for testing positive for males was 0.43 (95% CI 0.24, 0.79, P = 0.006), and 1.01 (95% CI 0.83, 1.22, P = 0.92) for females. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that there may be a protective effect of the MMR vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in males but not females. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Measles/prevention & control[MESH] |*Mumps[MESH] |*Rubella[MESH] |COVID-19 Vaccines[MESH] |Case-Control Studies[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Health Personnel[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Recent MMR vaccination in health care workers and Covid-19: A test neg(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing