Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.06.011

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.06.011
suck pdf from google scholar
34171532!8220196!34171532
unlimited free pdf from europmc34171532    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=34171532&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid34171532      J+Vasc+Surg+Venous+Lymphat+Disord 2022 ; 10 (1): 8-13
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • The clinical significance of ultra-high D-dimer levels #MMPMID34171532
  • Schafer K; Goldschmidt E; Oostra D; Fish J; Russell T; Lurie F
  • J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022[Jan]; 10 (1): 8-13 PMID34171532show ga
  • OBJECTIVE: Plasma D-dimer levels >5000 ng/mL are encountered in a number of conditions other than venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recent studies have used plasma D-dimer levels as a prognostic indicator for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. The implications of abnormal levels are less clear for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with a baseline elevation in plasma D-dimer levels. In the present study, we reviewed the occurrence of plasma D-dimer levels >5000 ng/mL and investigated the clinical significance of this finding before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Inpatient records for a 4-year period were screened for laboratory results of plasma D-dimer levels >5000 ng/mL. The patient data were reviewed for the clinical identifiers commonly associated with elevated plasma D-dimer levels, including VTE, cancer, sepsis, pneumonia, other infection, bleeding, and trauma. The patients were then categorized into groups stratified by the plasma D-dimer level to allow for comparisons between the various clinical diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 671 patients were included in the present study. VTE was the most common diagnosis for patients with a plasma D-dimer level >5000 ng/mL, followed by cancer and pneumonia. Multiple clinical diagnoses were present in 61% of the patients. No clear cause for the ultra-high plasma D-dimer level could be identified in 11.3% of the patients. Among the patients lacking a clinical diagnosis at discharge, mortality was 24% in the 5000- to 10,000-ng/mL group, 28.6% in the 10,000- to 15,000-ng/mL group, and 75% in the >15,000-ng/mL group. CONCLUSIONS: VTE, cancer, and pneumonia were frequently present when ultra-high plasma D-dimer levels were encountered, and mortality was high when the levels were >15,000 ng/mL. The results from our study from a pre-COVID-19 patient population suggest that ultra-high plasma D-dimer levels indicate the presence of severe underlying disease. This should be considered when using the plasma D-dimer level as a screening tool or prognostic indicator for COVID-19 infection.
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Biomarkers/blood[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/blood/*complications/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Cross-Sectional Studies[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/*metabolism[MESH]
  • |Follow-Up Studies[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Ohio/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Retrospective Studies[MESH]
  • |Time Factors[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box