Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.pedn.2021.06.005

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.pedn.2021.06.005
suck pdf from google scholar
34171517!8205280!34171517
unlimited free pdf from europmc34171517    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid34171517      J+Pediatr+Nurs 2021 ; 61 (ä): 240-244
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Clinical Research #MMPMID34171517
  • Tran NN; Tran M; Lopez J; Woon J; Nguyen J; Brecht ML
  • J Pediatr Nurs 2021[Nov]; 61 (ä): 240-244 PMID34171517show ga
  • PURPOSE: Many public institutions and settings have taken action to limit exposure to and slow the spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). We sought to characterize the impact of stay-at-home orders on our study of cerebral autoregulation and its association with developmental delays in infants with congenital heart disease compared with healthy controls. DESIGN AND METHODS: We calculated the number of participants recruited (i.e., not enrolled in the study) and assessed (i.e., currently enrolled) before March 2020 (pre-COVID-19) and the number of participants that we could not recruit or assess between March and July 2020 (missed due to COVID-19), separately for congenital heart disease and healthy control infants, in reference to the impacts of COVID-19. We used negative binomial regressions to determine incidence rate ratios which compared participants recruited and assessed pre-COVID-19 and missed due to COVID-19. RESULTS: Recruitment and assessments significantly decreased following the pandemic, i.e., participants were more likely to be recruited or be assessed pre-COVID-19 compared to during the pandemic. Study participants were 3.3 times as likely to have assessments performed pre-COVID-19 compared to during the COVID-19 pandemic (p < 0.001). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Clinical research teams may consider making protocol modifications such as virtual visits or video recordings explaining the study, for example, to adjust to the restrictions caused by COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic drastically reduced recruitment and assessments completed in our study. Study teams will need to continue to modify procedures for recruitment and assessments that align with COVID-19 regulations to facilitate research progress during the pandemic.
  • |*COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Child[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box