Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jhqr.2021.04.005 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jhqr.2021.04.005 34147410!8130495!34147410     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=34147410&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       J+Healthc+Qual+Res 2021 ; 36 (5): 263-268 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34147410|t=2021. Impacto de las restricciones de visitas de familiares de pacientes por la pandemia de COVID-19 sobre la utilizacion de la contencion mecanica en un hospital de agudos: estudio observacional |pdf=|usr=}}{{34147410}} gab.com Text Impacto de las restricciones de visitas de familiares de pacientes por la pandemia de COVID-19 sobre la utilizacion de la contencion mecanica en un hospital de agudos: estudio observacional JO: J Healthc Qual Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34147410 #FOAvip INTRODUCTION: During the worldwide pandemic of COVID-19 caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, hospitals developed contingency plans that transformed and reorganized the hospital activity. One of the measures was to restrict access to family members of hospitalized patients. The presence of the patient's family is considered an alternative to physical restraint. The aim of this study is to compare the use of physical restraint in hospitalized patients in an acute care hospital during the previous period of the pandemic of COVID-19 with the post-confinement period with hospitals being still closed to family. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We made an observational study that compares the prevalence of physical restraint in an acute care hospital during the previous period to the alarm state (February 2020) with the second period, when visits where restricted (May 2020). From the clinical history of the patients with physical restraint we collected the following variables: sex, diagnostic, hospital admission unit, reason for using physical restraint, localization, length, type of material, registration in the medical record, information given to the family, alternatives to the physical restraint and injuries related to the physical restraint. RESULTS: We evaluated 690 patients: 388 during the previous period and 320 during the second period. From all patients, 29 needed physical restraint. The use of physical restraint went from 8 (2%) to 21 (7%) (p=0.003). In the second period, a not statistically significant increase in continuous physical restraint was identified compared to the first period. CONCLUSIONS: The physical restraint prevalence has been superior during the second period in which families were not present with the hospitalized patients. Twit Text FOAVip Impacto de las restricciones de visitas de familiares de pacientes por la pandemia de COVID-19 sobre la utilizacion de la contencion mecanica en un hospital de agudos: estudio observacional ????J Healthc Qual Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34147410 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34147410 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34147410}}</ref> Impacto de las restricciones de visitas de familiares de pacientes por la pandemia de COVID-19 sobre la utilizacion de la contencion mecanica en un hospital de agudos: estudio observacional #MMPMID34147410 Font R; Quintana S; Monistrol O J Healthc Qual Res 2021[Sep]; 36 (5): 263-268 PMID34147410show ga INTRODUCTION: During the worldwide pandemic of COVID-19 caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, hospitals developed contingency plans that transformed and reorganized the hospital activity. One of the measures was to restrict access to family members of hospitalized patients. The presence of the patient's family is considered an alternative to physical restraint. The aim of this study is to compare the use of physical restraint in hospitalized patients in an acute care hospital during the previous period of the pandemic of COVID-19 with the post-confinement period with hospitals being still closed to family. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We made an observational study that compares the prevalence of physical restraint in an acute care hospital during the previous period to the alarm state (February 2020) with the second period, when visits where restricted (May 2020). From the clinical history of the patients with physical restraint we collected the following variables: sex, diagnostic, hospital admission unit, reason for using physical restraint, localization, length, type of material, registration in the medical record, information given to the family, alternatives to the physical restraint and injuries related to the physical restraint. RESULTS: We evaluated 690 patients: 388 during the previous period and 320 during the second period. From all patients, 29 needed physical restraint. The use of physical restraint went from 8 (2%) to 21 (7%) (p=0.003). In the second period, a not statistically significant increase in continuous physical restraint was identified compared to the first period. CONCLUSIONS: The physical restraint prevalence has been superior during the second period in which families were not present with the hospitalized patients. |*Family[MESH] |*Visitors to Patients[MESH] |Acute Disease[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Aged, 80 and over[MESH] |COVID-19/*therapy[MESH] |Cross-Sectional Studies[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Hospitals[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH]Impacto de las restricciones de visitas de familiares de pacientes por(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing