Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1080/20477724.2021.1932136 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1080/20477724.2021.1932136 34107233!8547848!34107233     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Pathog+Glob+Health 2021 ; 115 (5): 273-276 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34107233|t=2021. A conceptual approach to the rationale for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allocation prioritisation |pdf=|usr=}}{{34107233}} gab.com Text A conceptual approach to the rationale for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allocation prioritisation JO: Pathog Glob Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34107233 #FOAvip Currently vaccines protecting from COVID-19 are a scarce resource. Prioritising vaccination for certain groups of society is placed in a context of uncertainty due to changing evidence on the available vaccines and changing infection dynamics. To meet accepted ethical standards of procedural justice and individual autonomy, vaccine allocation strategies need to state reasons for prioritisation explicitly while at the same time communicating the expected risks and benefits of vaccination at different times and with different vaccines transparently. In this article, we provide a concept summarising epidemiological considerations underlying current vaccine prioritisation strategies in an accessible way. We define six priority groups (vulnerable individuals, persons in close contact with the vulnerable, key workers with direct work-related contact with the public, key workers without direct work-related contact to the public, dependents of key workers and members of groups with high interpersonal contact rates) and state vaccine priorities for them. Additionally, prioritisation may follow non-epidemiological considerations including the aim to increase intra-societal justice and reducing inequality. While national prioritisation plans integrate many of these concepts, the international community has so far failed to guarantee equitable or procedurally just access to vaccines across settings with different levels of wealth. Twit Text FOAVip A conceptual approach to the rationale for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allocation prioritisation ????Pathog Glob Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34107233 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34107233 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34107233}}</ref> A conceptual approach to the rationale for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allocation prioritisation #MMPMID34107233 Kohns Vasconcelos M; Marazia C; Koniordou M; Fangerau H; Drexler I; Afum-Adjei Awuah A Pathog Glob Health 2021[Jul]; 115 (5): 273-276 PMID34107233show ga Currently vaccines protecting from COVID-19 are a scarce resource. Prioritising vaccination for certain groups of society is placed in a context of uncertainty due to changing evidence on the available vaccines and changing infection dynamics. To meet accepted ethical standards of procedural justice and individual autonomy, vaccine allocation strategies need to state reasons for prioritisation explicitly while at the same time communicating the expected risks and benefits of vaccination at different times and with different vaccines transparently. In this article, we provide a concept summarising epidemiological considerations underlying current vaccine prioritisation strategies in an accessible way. We define six priority groups (vulnerable individuals, persons in close contact with the vulnerable, key workers with direct work-related contact with the public, key workers without direct work-related contact to the public, dependents of key workers and members of groups with high interpersonal contact rates) and state vaccine priorities for them. Additionally, prioritisation may follow non-epidemiological considerations including the aim to increase intra-societal justice and reducing inequality. While national prioritisation plans integrate many of these concepts, the international community has so far failed to guarantee equitable or procedurally just access to vaccines across settings with different levels of wealth. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Vaccines[MESH] |COVID-19 Vaccines[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]A conceptual approach to the rationale for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allocati(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing