Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1590/S1980-220X2020029403735

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1590/S1980-220X2020029403735
suck pdf from google scholar
34105686!?!34105686

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=34105686&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid34105686      Rev+Esc+Enferm+USP 2021 ; 55 (?): e03735
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Fatores associados a pratica do uso de mascaras pela populacao paraibana durante a pandemia da COVID-19 #MMPMID34105686
  • Pereira-Avila FMV; Lam SC; Gir E; Goes FGB; Freire MEM; Silva ACOE
  • Rev Esc Enferm USP 2021[]; 55 (?): e03735 PMID34105686show ga
  • OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the practice of using masks by the population of the Brazilian state of Paraiba during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: Cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study conducted with adults living in the state of Paraiba through an online instrument from April to May 2020, through the Face Mask Use Scale of Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas da Paraiba. RESULTS: The participants amounted to 1,307 (100.0%) individuals, who were predominantly female (78.0%), aged 35 to 45 (32.3%), married (53.3%) and post-graduates (46.9%). The mean score for the practice of using masks was 18.7 (SD = 8.0; minimum 6.00; maximum 30). The use of masks for self-protection scored 9.8 (DP = 3.9; minimum 3.0; maximum 15.0), whereas the score for protection of others was 8.9 (SD = 4.5; minimum 3.0; maximum 15.0). In the comparison between the scores of the practice of using masks, there was a significant statistical difference for gender, education, age group, and income (p
  • |Adolescent[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Age Factors[MESH]
  • |Brazil[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Cross-Sectional Studies[MESH]
  • |Educational Status[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Income[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Masks/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Sex Factors[MESH]
  • |Surveys and Questionnaires[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box