Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y 34090351!8179078!34090351     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       BMC+Med+Res+Methodol 2021 ; 21 (1): 117 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34090351|t=2021. Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{34090351}} gab.com Text Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic JO: BMC Med Res Methodol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34090351 #FOAvip In the last decade Open Science principles have been successfully advocated for and are being slowly adopted in different research communities. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic many publishers and researchers have sped up their adoption of Open Science practices, sometimes embracing them fully and sometimes partially or in a sub-optimal manner. In this article, we express concerns about the violation of some of the Open Science principles and its potential impact on the quality of research output. We provide evidence of the misuses of these principles at different stages of the scientific process. We call for a wider adoption of Open Science practices in the hope that this work will encourage a broader endorsement of Open Science principles and serve as a reminder that science should always be a rigorous process, reliable and transparent, especially in the context of a pandemic where research findings are being translated into practice even more rapidly. We provide all data and scripts at https://osf.io/renxy/ . Twit Text FOAVip Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic ????BMC Med Res Methodol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34090351 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34090351 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34090351}}</ref> Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic #MMPMID34090351 Besancon L; Peiffer-Smadja N; Segalas C; Jiang H; Masuzzo P; Smout C; Billy E; Deforet M; Leyrat C BMC Med Res Methodol 2021[Jun]; 21 (1): 117 PMID34090351show ga In the last decade Open Science principles have been successfully advocated for and are being slowly adopted in different research communities. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic many publishers and researchers have sped up their adoption of Open Science practices, sometimes embracing them fully and sometimes partially or in a sub-optimal manner. In this article, we express concerns about the violation of some of the Open Science principles and its potential impact on the quality of research output. We provide evidence of the misuses of these principles at different stages of the scientific process. We call for a wider adoption of Open Science practices in the hope that this work will encourage a broader endorsement of Open Science principles and serve as a reminder that science should always be a rigorous process, reliable and transparent, especially in the context of a pandemic where research findings are being translated into practice even more rapidly. We provide all data and scripts at https://osf.io/renxy/ . |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Pandemics/prevention & control[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Publications[MESH] |Research Personnel[MESH]Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing