Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1038/s42003-021-02232-9 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/s42003-021-02232-9 34083749!8175360!34083749     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Commun+Biol 2021 ; 4 (1): 686 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34083749|t=2021. The detection dogs test is more sensitive than real-time PCR in screening for SARS-CoV-2 |pdf=|usr=}}{{34083749}} gab.com Text The detection dogs test is more sensitive than real-time PCR in screening for SARS-CoV-2 JO: Commun Biol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34083749 #FOAvip In January 2020, the coronavirus disease was declared, by the World Health Organization as a global public health emergency. Recommendations from the WHO COVID Emergency Committee continue to support strengthening COVID surveillance systems, including timely access to effective diagnostics. Questions were raised about the validity of considering the RT-PCR as the gold standard in COVID-19 diagnosis. It has been suggested that a variety of methods should be used to evaluate advocated tests. Dogs had been successfully trained and employed to detect diseases in humans. Here we show that upon training explosives detection dogs on sniffing COVID-19 odor in patients' sweat, those dogs were able to successfully screen out 3249 individuals who tested negative for the SARS-CoV-2, from a cohort of 3290 individuals. Additionally, using Bayesian analysis, the sensitivity of the K9 test was found to be superior to the RT-PCR test performed on nasal swabs from a cohort of 3134 persons. Given its high sensitivity, short turn-around-time, low cost, less invasiveness, and ease of application, the detection dogs test lends itself as a better alternative to the RT-PCR in screening for SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic individuals. Twit Text FOAVip The detection dogs test is more sensitive than real-time PCR in screening for SARS-CoV-2 ????Commun Biol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34083749 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34083749 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34083749}}</ref> The detection dogs test is more sensitive than real-time PCR in screening for SARS-CoV-2 #MMPMID34083749 Hag-Ali M; AlShamsi AS; Boeijen L; Mahmmod Y; Manzoor R; Rutten H; Mweu MM; El-Tholoth M; AlShamsi AA Commun Biol 2021[Jun]; 4 (1): 686 PMID34083749show ga In January 2020, the coronavirus disease was declared, by the World Health Organization as a global public health emergency. Recommendations from the WHO COVID Emergency Committee continue to support strengthening COVID surveillance systems, including timely access to effective diagnostics. Questions were raised about the validity of considering the RT-PCR as the gold standard in COVID-19 diagnosis. It has been suggested that a variety of methods should be used to evaluate advocated tests. Dogs had been successfully trained and employed to detect diseases in humans. Here we show that upon training explosives detection dogs on sniffing COVID-19 odor in patients' sweat, those dogs were able to successfully screen out 3249 individuals who tested negative for the SARS-CoV-2, from a cohort of 3290 individuals. Additionally, using Bayesian analysis, the sensitivity of the K9 test was found to be superior to the RT-PCR test performed on nasal swabs from a cohort of 3134 persons. Given its high sensitivity, short turn-around-time, low cost, less invasiveness, and ease of application, the detection dogs test lends itself as a better alternative to the RT-PCR in screening for SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic individuals. |*Odorants/analysis[MESH] |*Working Dogs[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Animals[MESH] |Bayes Theorem[MESH] |COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/economics/methods[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing/economics/*methods[MESH] |COVID-19/*diagnosis[MESH] |Dogs[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification[MESH] |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH] |Smell[MESH]The detection dogs test is more sensitive than real-time PCR in screen(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing