Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1215/03616878-9349114 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1215/03616878-9349114 34075406!ä!34075406 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Health+Polit+Policy+Law 2021 ; 46 (6): 959-987 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34075406|t=2021. Who Counts Where? COVID-19 Surveillance in Federal Countries |pdf=|usr=}}{{34075406}} gab.com Text Who Counts Where COVID-19 Surveillance in Federal Countries JO: J Health Polit Policy Law http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34075406 #FOAvip CONTEXT: While the World Health Organization (WHO) has established guidance on COVID-19 surveillance, little is known about implementation of these guidelines in federations, which fragment authority across multiple levels of government. This study examines how subnational governments in federal democracies collect and report data on COVID-19 cases and mortality associated with COVID-19. METHODS: We collected data from subnational government websites in 15 federal democracies to construct indices of COVID-19 data quality. Using bivariate and multivariate regression, we analyzed the relationship between these indices and indicators of state capacity, the decentralization of resources and authority, and the quality of democratic institutions. We supplement these quantitative analyses with qualitative case studies of subnational COVID-19 data in Brazil, Spain, and the United States. FINDINGS: Subnational governments in federations vary in their collection of data on COVID-19 mortality, testing, hospitalization, and demographics. There are statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) between subnational data quality and key indicators of public health system capacity, fiscal decentralization, and the quality of democratic institutions. Case studies illustrate the importance of both governmental and civil-society institutions that foster accountability. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of subnational COVID-19 surveillance data in federations depends in part on public health system capacity, fiscal decentralization, and the quality of democracy. Twit Text FOAVip Who Counts Where COVID-19 Surveillance in Federal Countries ????J Health Polit Policy Law http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34075406 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34075406 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34075406}}</ref> Who Counts Where? COVID-19 Surveillance in Federal Countries #MMPMID34075406 Rocco P; Rich JAJ; Klasa K; Dubin KA; Beland D J Health Polit Policy Law 2021[Dec]; 46 (6): 959-987 PMID34075406show ga CONTEXT: While the World Health Organization (WHO) has established guidance on COVID-19 surveillance, little is known about implementation of these guidelines in federations, which fragment authority across multiple levels of government. This study examines how subnational governments in federal democracies collect and report data on COVID-19 cases and mortality associated with COVID-19. METHODS: We collected data from subnational government websites in 15 federal democracies to construct indices of COVID-19 data quality. Using bivariate and multivariate regression, we analyzed the relationship between these indices and indicators of state capacity, the decentralization of resources and authority, and the quality of democratic institutions. We supplement these quantitative analyses with qualitative case studies of subnational COVID-19 data in Brazil, Spain, and the United States. FINDINGS: Subnational governments in federations vary in their collection of data on COVID-19 mortality, testing, hospitalization, and demographics. There are statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) between subnational data quality and key indicators of public health system capacity, fiscal decentralization, and the quality of democratic institutions. Case studies illustrate the importance of both governmental and civil-society institutions that foster accountability. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of subnational COVID-19 surveillance data in federations depends in part on public health system capacity, fiscal decentralization, and the quality of democracy. |*COVID-19[MESH] |Government[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Public Health[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |United States[MESH]Who Counts Where? COVID-19 Surveillance in Federal Countries (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing