Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.3390/v13050936

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3390/v13050936
suck pdf from google scholar
34070175!8158508!34070175
unlimited free pdf from europmc34070175    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=34070175&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid34070175      Viruses 2021 ; 13 (5): ?
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Overview of Bat and Wildlife Coronavirus Surveillance in Africa: A Framework for Global Investigations #MMPMID34070175
  • Geldenhuys M; Mortlock M; Epstein JH; Paweska JT; Weyer J; Markotter W
  • Viruses 2021[May]; 13 (5): ? PMID34070175show ga
  • The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had devastating health and socio-economic impacts. Human activities, especially at the wildlife interphase, are at the core of forces driving the emergence of new viral agents. Global surveillance activities have identified bats as the natural hosts of diverse coronaviruses, with other domestic and wildlife animal species possibly acting as intermediate or spillover hosts. The African continent is confronted by several factors that challenge prevention and response to novel disease emergences, such as high species diversity, inadequate health systems, and drastic social and ecosystem changes. We reviewed published animal coronavirus surveillance studies conducted in Africa, specifically summarizing surveillance approaches, species numbers tested, and findings. Far more surveillance has been initiated among bat populations than other wildlife and domestic animals, with nearly 26,000 bat individuals tested. Though coronaviruses have been identified from approximately 7% of the total bats tested, surveillance among other animals identified coronaviruses in less than 1%. In addition to a large undescribed diversity, sequences related to four of the seven human coronaviruses have been reported from African bats. The review highlights research gaps and the disparity in surveillance efforts between different animal groups (particularly potential spillover hosts) and concludes with proposed strategies for improved future biosurveillance.
  • |Africa/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Animals[MESH]
  • |Animals, Wild/virology[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Chiroptera/virology[MESH]
  • |Coronaviridae/genetics[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Infections/*epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus/pathogenicity[MESH]
  • |Ecosystem[MESH]
  • |Epidemiological Monitoring/*veterinary[MESH]
  • |Genetic Variation[MESH]
  • |Genome, Viral[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Phylogeny[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box