Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=34054311&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215
Distance Education During COVID-19 Pandemic: A College of Pharmacy Experience #MMPMID34054311
Altwaijry N; Ibrahim A; Binsuwaidan R; Alnajjar LI; Alsfouk BA; Almutairi R
Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2021[]; 14 (?): 2099-2110 PMID34054311show ga
PURPOSE: This study aimed at describing the experience of academic staff and students with distance education, during the COVID-19 pandemic, at a college of pharmacy in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This study used a mixed-method approach. The first phase implemented a survey that targeted both academic staff and students to evaluate their experiences with distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Then, a focus group discussion was conducted to explore, in-depth, their experience. The survey consisted of five domains as follows: readiness for the shift to distance education during the full and partial lockdown, perception towards distance education, barriers against distance education, and the acquisitions due to distance education. A five-point Likert scale was used to assess participants' responses to the different domains (mean score +/- standard deviation). RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of the academic staff and 65% of the students responded to the survey. Participants' views were positive for readiness for the shift to distance education during the full lockdown (3.89+/-0.42 for academic staff and 3.82+/-0.50 for students) with almost similar evaluation for the readiness during the blended learning period (3.91+/-0.44 for staff and 3.83+/-0.59 for students). The findings showed a generally positive perception towards distance education (3.59+/- 0.67 for academic staff and 3.47+/-0.64 for students). The acquisitions due to distance education were also positive (3.95+/-0.72 for academic staff and 3.78+/-0.77 for students). Nonetheless, some barriers that affected distance education were raised with an overall neutral view from both academic staff (3.31+/-0.72) and students (3.31+/-0.64), with different responses for the individual items. Qualitative findings from the focus group discussions explored the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges, with emphasis on the areas for improvement. CONCLUSION: Although the shift for distance education was out of a sudden, participants showed overall positive views about their experience with distance education and highlighted areas for improvement.
free
free
free
Risk+Manag+Healthc+Policy 2021 ; 14 (?): 2099-2110
