Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147876 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147876 34051508!8139329!34051508     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 269.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 269.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 269.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 269.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 269.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 269.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Sci+Total+Environ 2021 ; 789 (ä): 147876 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34051508|t=2021. Physical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 containment: An observational study in the United States |pdf=|usr=}}{{34051508}} gab.com Text Physical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 containment: An observational study in the United States JO: Sci Total Environ http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34051508 #FOAvip Governments may relax physical distancing interventions for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) containment in warm seasons/areas to prevent economic contractions. However, it is not clear whether higher temperature may offset the transmission risk posed by this relaxation. This study aims to investigate the associations of the effective reproductive number (R(t)) of Covid-19 with ambient temperature and the implementation of physical distancing interventions in the United States (US). This study included 50 states and one territory of the US with 4,532,650 confirmed cases between 29 January and 31 July 2020. We used an interrupted time-series model with a state-level random intercept for data analysis. An interaction term of 'physical distancingxtemperature' was included to examine their interactions. Stratified analyses by temperature and physical distancing implementation were also performed to analyse the modifying effects. The overall median (interquartile range) R(t) was 1.2 (1.0-2.3). The implementation of physical distancing was associated with a 12% decrease in the risk of R(t) (relative risk [RR]: 0.88, 95% confident interval [CI]: 0.86-0.89), and each 5 degrees C increase in temperature was associated with a 2% decrease (RR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.97-0.98). We observed a statistically significant interaction between temperature and physical distancing implementation, but all the RRs were small (close to one). The containing effects of high temperature were attenuated by 5.1% when physical distancing was implemented. The association of COVID-19 R(t) with physical distancing implementation was more stable (0.88 vs. 0.89 in days when temperature was low and high, respectively). Increased temperature did not offset the risk of Covid-19 R(t) posed by the relaxation of physical distancing implementation. Our study does not recommend relaxing the implementation of physical distancing interventions in warm seasons/areas. Twit Text FOAVip Physical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 containment: An observational study in the United States ????Sci Total Environ http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34051508 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34051508 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34051508}}</ref> Physical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 containment: An observational study in the United States #MMPMID34051508 Guo C; Chan SHT; Lin C; Zeng Y; Bo Y; Zhang Y; Hossain S; Chan JWM; Yeung DW; Lau AKH; Lao XQ Sci Total Environ 2021[Oct]; 789 (ä): 147876 PMID34051508show ga Governments may relax physical distancing interventions for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) containment in warm seasons/areas to prevent economic contractions. However, it is not clear whether higher temperature may offset the transmission risk posed by this relaxation. This study aims to investigate the associations of the effective reproductive number (R(t)) of Covid-19 with ambient temperature and the implementation of physical distancing interventions in the United States (US). This study included 50 states and one territory of the US with 4,532,650 confirmed cases between 29 January and 31 July 2020. We used an interrupted time-series model with a state-level random intercept for data analysis. An interaction term of 'physical distancingxtemperature' was included to examine their interactions. Stratified analyses by temperature and physical distancing implementation were also performed to analyse the modifying effects. The overall median (interquartile range) R(t) was 1.2 (1.0-2.3). The implementation of physical distancing was associated with a 12% decrease in the risk of R(t) (relative risk [RR]: 0.88, 95% confident interval [CI]: 0.86-0.89), and each 5 degrees C increase in temperature was associated with a 2% decrease (RR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.97-0.98). We observed a statistically significant interaction between temperature and physical distancing implementation, but all the RRs were small (close to one). The containing effects of high temperature were attenuated by 5.1% when physical distancing was implemented. The association of COVID-19 R(t) with physical distancing implementation was more stable (0.88 vs. 0.89 in days when temperature was low and high, respectively). Increased temperature did not offset the risk of Covid-19 R(t) posed by the relaxation of physical distancing implementation. Our study does not recommend relaxing the implementation of physical distancing interventions in warm seasons/areas. |*COVID-19[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Physical Distancing[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Temperature[MESH]Physical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 c(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing