Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/hast.1255 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/hast.1255 34028823!8207016!34028823     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Hastings+Cent+Rep 2021 ; 51 (3): 5-7 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34028823|t=2021. Reciprocity and Liability Protections during the Covid-19 Pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{34028823}} gab.com Text Reciprocity and Liability Protections during the Covid-19 Pandemic JO: Hastings Cent Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34028823 #FOAvip During the Covid-19 pandemic, as resources dwindled, clinicians, health care institutions, and policymakers have expressed concern about potential legal liability for following crisis standards of care (CSC) plans. Although there is no robust empirical research to demonstrate that liability protections actually influence physician behavior, we argue that limited liability protections for health care professionals who follow established CSC plans may instead be justified by reliance on the principle of reciprocity. Expecting physicians to do something they know will harm their patients causes moral distress and suffering that may leave lasting scars. Limited liability shields are both appropriate and proportionate to the risk physicians are being asked to take in such circumstances. Under certain narrow circumstances, it remains unclear that the standard of care is sufficiently flexible to protect physicians from liability. Given this uncertainty, the likelihood that physicians would be sued for such an act, and their desire for such immunity, this limited protection is morally legitimate. Twit Text FOAVip Reciprocity and Liability Protections during the Covid-19 Pandemic ????Hastings Cent Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34028823 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34028823 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34028823}}</ref> Reciprocity and Liability Protections during the Covid-19 Pandemic #MMPMID34028823 Koch VG; Hoffmann DE Hastings Cent Rep 2021[May]; 51 (3): 5-7 PMID34028823show ga During the Covid-19 pandemic, as resources dwindled, clinicians, health care institutions, and policymakers have expressed concern about potential legal liability for following crisis standards of care (CSC) plans. Although there is no robust empirical research to demonstrate that liability protections actually influence physician behavior, we argue that limited liability protections for health care professionals who follow established CSC plans may instead be justified by reliance on the principle of reciprocity. Expecting physicians to do something they know will harm their patients causes moral distress and suffering that may leave lasting scars. Limited liability shields are both appropriate and proportionate to the risk physicians are being asked to take in such circumstances. Under certain narrow circumstances, it remains unclear that the standard of care is sufficiently flexible to protect physicians from liability. Given this uncertainty, the likelihood that physicians would be sued for such an act, and their desire for such immunity, this limited protection is morally legitimate. |*Liability, Legal[MESH] |COVID-19/*epidemiology[MESH] |Health Care Rationing/legislation & jurisprudence[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Physicians/*legislation & jurisprudence[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Reciprocity and Liability Protections during the Covid-19 Pandemic (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing