Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1038/s41591-021-01379-6 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/s41591-021-01379-6 34007071!ä!34007071 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Nat+Med 2021 ; 27 (7): 1298-1307 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34007071|t=2021. Equitable allocation of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States |pdf=|usr=}}{{34007071}} gab.com Text Equitable allocation of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States JO: Nat Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34007071 #FOAvip Many vaccine rationing guidelines urge planners to recognize, and ideally reduce, inequities. In the United States, allocation frameworks are determined by each of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 64 jurisdictions (50 states, the District of Columbia, five cities and eight territories). In this study, we analyzed vaccine allocation plans published by 8 November 2020, tracking updates through to 30 March 2021. We evaluated whether jurisdictions adopted proposals to reduce inequity using disadvantage indices and related place-based measures. By 30 March 2021, 14 jurisdictions had prioritized specific zip codes in combination with metrics such as COVID-19 incidence, and 37 jurisdictions (including 34 states) had adopted disadvantage indices, compared to 19 jurisdictions in November 2020. Uptake of indices doubled from 7 to 14 among the jurisdictions with the largest shares of disadvantaged communities. Five applications were distinguished: (1) prioritizing disadvantaged groups through increased shares of vaccines or vaccination appointments; (2) defining priority groups or areas; (3) tailoring outreach and communication; (4) planning the location of dispensing sites; and (5) monitoring receipt. To ensure that equity features centrally in allocation plans, policymakers at the federal, state and local levels should universalize the uptake of disadvantage indices and related place-based measures. Twit Text FOAVip Equitable allocation of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States ????Nat Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34007071 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34007071 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34007071}}</ref> Equitable allocation of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States #MMPMID34007071 Schmidt H; Weintraub R; Williams MA; Miller K; Buttenheim A; Sadecki E; Wu H; Doiphode A; Nagpal N; Gostin LO; Shen AA Nat Med 2021[Jul]; 27 (7): 1298-1307 PMID34007071show ga Many vaccine rationing guidelines urge planners to recognize, and ideally reduce, inequities. In the United States, allocation frameworks are determined by each of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 64 jurisdictions (50 states, the District of Columbia, five cities and eight territories). In this study, we analyzed vaccine allocation plans published by 8 November 2020, tracking updates through to 30 March 2021. We evaluated whether jurisdictions adopted proposals to reduce inequity using disadvantage indices and related place-based measures. By 30 March 2021, 14 jurisdictions had prioritized specific zip codes in combination with metrics such as COVID-19 incidence, and 37 jurisdictions (including 34 states) had adopted disadvantage indices, compared to 19 jurisdictions in November 2020. Uptake of indices doubled from 7 to 14 among the jurisdictions with the largest shares of disadvantaged communities. Five applications were distinguished: (1) prioritizing disadvantaged groups through increased shares of vaccines or vaccination appointments; (2) defining priority groups or areas; (3) tailoring outreach and communication; (4) planning the location of dispensing sites; and (5) monitoring receipt. To ensure that equity features centrally in allocation plans, policymakers at the federal, state and local levels should universalize the uptake of disadvantage indices and related place-based measures. |*Health Policy[MESH] |*Socioeconomic Factors[MESH] |COVID-19 Vaccines/*therapeutic use[MESH] |COVID-19/epidemiology/*prevention & control[MESH] |Guidelines as Topic[MESH] |Health Care Rationing/*methods[MESH] |Health Equity[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Incidence[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Equitable allocation of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing