Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1038/s41586-021-03606-z

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/s41586-021-03606-z
suck pdf from google scholar
33979832!ä!33979832

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33979832      Nature 2021 ; 594 (7863): 408-412
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • The epidemiological impact of the NHS COVID-19 app #MMPMID33979832
  • Wymant C; Ferretti L; Tsallis D; Charalambides M; Abeler-Dorner L; Bonsall D; Hinch R; Kendall M; Milsom L; Ayres M; Holmes C; Briers M; Fraser C
  • Nature 2021[Jun]; 594 (7863): 408-412 PMID33979832show ga
  • The COVID-19 pandemic has seen the emergence of digital contact tracing to help to prevent the spread of the disease. A mobile phone app records proximity events between app users, and when a user tests positive for COVID-19, their recent contacts can be notified instantly. Theoretical evidence has supported this new public health intervention(1-6), but its epidemiological impact has remained uncertain(7). Here we investigate the impact of the National Health Service (NHS) COVID-19 app for England and Wales, from its launch on 24 September 2020 to the end of December 2020. It was used regularly by approximately 16.5 million users (28% of the total population), and sent approximately 1.7 million exposure notifications: 4.2 per index case consenting to contact tracing. We estimated that the fraction of individuals notified by the app who subsequently showed symptoms and tested positive (the secondary attack rate (SAR)) was 6%, similar to the SAR for manually traced close contacts. We estimated the number of cases averted by the app using two complementary approaches: modelling based on the notifications and SAR gave an estimate of 284,000 (central 95% range of sensitivity analyses 108,000-450,000), and statistical comparison of matched neighbouring local authorities gave an estimate of 594,000 (95% confidence interval 317,000-914,000). Approximately one case was averted for each case consenting to notification of their contacts. We estimated that for every percentage point increase in app uptake, the number of cases could be reduced by 0.8% (using modelling) or 2.3% (using statistical analysis). These findings support the continued development and deployment of such apps in populations that are awaiting full protection from vaccines.
  • |Basic Reproduction Number[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*epidemiology/mortality/*prevention & control/transmission[MESH]
  • |Contact Tracing/*instrumentation/*methods[MESH]
  • |England/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Mobile Applications/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Mortality[MESH]
  • |National Health Programs[MESH]
  • |Quarantine[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box