Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103689 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103689 33979577!ä!33979577 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Dent 2021 ; 110 (ä): 103689 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33979577|t=2021. Glass hybrid versus composite for non-carious cervical lesions: Survival, restoration quality and costs in randomized controlled trial after 3 years |pdf=|usr=}}{{33979577}} gab.com Text Glass hybrid versus composite for non-carious cervical lesions: Survival, restoration quality and costs in randomized controlled trial after 3 years JO: J Dent http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33979577 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: This study compared survival, restoration quality and costs of glass hybrid (GH; EQUIA Forte Fil/EQUIA Forte Coat) and resin composite restorations (RC; OptiBond FL/Filtek Supreme XTE) of sclerotic non-carious cervical lesions. METHODS: This is a cluster-randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02631161). 88 patients (50-70 years) with 175 sNCCLs were randomized to receive GH or RC. Restorations were placed without mechanical cavity preparation and followed for a mean 36 (min/max: 31/55) months (variable follow-up due to COVID-19 lockdown). Restoration quality was re-evaluated at 1-, 18- and 36-months using FDI-criteria. Survival was assessed using multi-level Cox-regression analysis. Costs were estimated from a payer's perspective in Germany. Initial costs were determined based on micro-costing using time recordings and hourly costs, and follow-up costs based on statutory insurance fee-item-catalogues. RESULTS: 88 patients (175 restorations) were treated; 43 received GH (83 restorations), 45 RC (92 restorations). 17? GH and 19 RC showed total retention loss, 5? GH were partially lost (p?=?0.396/Cox). FDI ratings were not sufficiently different for any domain except surface luster, where RC showed higher score (p?<?0.001). Costs were initially lower for GH (32.57; SD 16.36 euro) than RC (44.25; SD 21.40 euro), while re-treatment costs were similar (GH: 9.15; SD 15.70 euro; RC: 7.35; SD 14.51 euro), resulting in significantly lower costs for GH (GH: 41.72; SD 25.08 euro) than RC (51.60; 26.17 euro) (p?<?0.001/GLM). CONCLUSIONS: While survival was not significantly different, GH was significantly less costly both initially and long-term than RC for restoring non-carious cervical lesions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Within this trial, survival was not significantly different between GH and RC to restore sclerotic NCCLs. As GH was significantly less costly both initially and long-term than RC, using RC was only cost-effective for payers willing to invest high additional expenses per minimal survival gains. Twit Text FOAVip Glass hybrid versus composite for non-carious cervical lesions: Survival, restoration quality and costs in randomized controlled trial after 3 years ????J Dent http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33979577 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33979577 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33979577}}</ref> Glass hybrid versus composite for non-carious cervical lesions: Survival, restoration quality and costs in randomized controlled trial after 3 years #MMPMID33979577 Schwendicke F; Muller A; Seifert T; Jeggle-Engbert LM; Paris S; Gostemeyer G J Dent 2021[Jul]; 110 (ä): 103689 PMID33979577show ga OBJECTIVE: This study compared survival, restoration quality and costs of glass hybrid (GH; EQUIA Forte Fil/EQUIA Forte Coat) and resin composite restorations (RC; OptiBond FL/Filtek Supreme XTE) of sclerotic non-carious cervical lesions. METHODS: This is a cluster-randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02631161). 88 patients (50-70 years) with 175 sNCCLs were randomized to receive GH or RC. Restorations were placed without mechanical cavity preparation and followed for a mean 36 (min/max: 31/55) months (variable follow-up due to COVID-19 lockdown). Restoration quality was re-evaluated at 1-, 18- and 36-months using FDI-criteria. Survival was assessed using multi-level Cox-regression analysis. Costs were estimated from a payer's perspective in Germany. Initial costs were determined based on micro-costing using time recordings and hourly costs, and follow-up costs based on statutory insurance fee-item-catalogues. RESULTS: 88 patients (175 restorations) were treated; 43 received GH (83 restorations), 45 RC (92 restorations). 17? GH and 19 RC showed total retention loss, 5? GH were partially lost (p?=?0.396/Cox). FDI ratings were not sufficiently different for any domain except surface luster, where RC showed higher score (p? |*COVID-19[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control[MESH] |Composite Resins[MESH] |Dental Restoration, Permanent[MESH] |Germany[MESH] |Glass Ionomer Cements[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Glass hybrid versus composite for non-carious cervical lesions: Surviv(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing