Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/hsr2.274 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/hsr2.274 33977156!8093857!33977156     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Health+Sci+Rep 2021 ; 4 (2): e274 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33977156|t=2021. Estimation of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) reproduction number and case fatality rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis |pdf=|usr=}}{{33977156}} gab.com Text Estimation of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) reproduction number and case fatality rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis JO: Health Sci Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33977156 #FOAvip BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Realizing the transmission potential and the magnitude of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) aids public health monitoring, strategies, and preparation. Two fundamental parameters, the basic reproduction number (R (0)) and case fatality rate (CFR) of COVID-19, help in this understanding process. The objective of this study was to estimate the R (0) and CFR of COVID-19 and assess whether the parameters vary in different regions of the world. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review to find the reported estimates of the R (0) and the CFR in articles from international databases between January 1 and August 31, 2020. Random-effect models and Forest plots were implemented to evaluate the mean effect size of R (0) and the CFR. Furthermore, R (0) and CFR of the studies were quantified based on geographic location, the tests/thousand population, and the median population age of the countries where the studies were conducted. To assess statistical heterogeneity among the selected articles, the I (2) statistic and the Cochran's Q test were used. RESULTS: Forty-five studies involving R (0) and 34 studies involving CFR were included. The pooled estimation of R (0) was 2.69 (95% CI: 2.40, 2.98), and that of the CFR was 2.67 (2.25, 3.13). The CFR in different regions of the world varied significantly, from 2.49 (2.08, 2.94) in Asia to 3.40 (2.81, 4.04) in North America. We observed higher mean CFR values for the countries with lower tests (3.15 vs 2.16) and greater median population age (3.13 vs 2.27). However, R (0) did not vary significantly in different regions of the world. CONCLUSIONS: An R (0) of 2.69 and a CFR of 2.67 indicate the severity of the COVID-19. Although R (0) and CFR may vary over time, space, and demographics, we recommend considering these figures in control and prevention measures. Twit Text FOAVip Estimation of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) reproduction number and case fatality rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis ????Health Sci Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33977156 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33977156 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33977156}}</ref> Estimation of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) reproduction number and case fatality rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis #MMPMID33977156 Ahammed T; Anjum A; Rahman MM; Haider N; Kock R; Uddin MJ Health Sci Rep 2021[Jun]; 4 (2): e274 PMID33977156show ga BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Realizing the transmission potential and the magnitude of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) aids public health monitoring, strategies, and preparation. Two fundamental parameters, the basic reproduction number (R (0)) and case fatality rate (CFR) of COVID-19, help in this understanding process. The objective of this study was to estimate the R (0) and CFR of COVID-19 and assess whether the parameters vary in different regions of the world. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review to find the reported estimates of the R (0) and the CFR in articles from international databases between January 1 and August 31, 2020. Random-effect models and Forest plots were implemented to evaluate the mean effect size of R (0) and the CFR. Furthermore, R (0) and CFR of the studies were quantified based on geographic location, the tests/thousand population, and the median population age of the countries where the studies were conducted. To assess statistical heterogeneity among the selected articles, the I (2) statistic and the Cochran's Q test were used. RESULTS: Forty-five studies involving R (0) and 34 studies involving CFR were included. The pooled estimation of R (0) was 2.69 (95% CI: 2.40, 2.98), and that of the CFR was 2.67 (2.25, 3.13). The CFR in different regions of the world varied significantly, from 2.49 (2.08, 2.94) in Asia to 3.40 (2.81, 4.04) in North America. We observed higher mean CFR values for the countries with lower tests (3.15 vs 2.16) and greater median population age (3.13 vs 2.27). However, R (0) did not vary significantly in different regions of the world. CONCLUSIONS: An R (0) of 2.69 and a CFR of 2.67 indicate the severity of the COVID-19. Although R (0) and CFR may vary over time, space, and demographics, we recommend considering these figures in control and prevention measures. äEstimation of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) reproduction number and cas(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing