Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1038/s41416-021-01361-6

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/s41416-021-01361-6
suck pdf from google scholar
33972746!8108433!33972746
unlimited free pdf from europmc33972746    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33972746      Br+J+Cancer 2021 ; 125 (5): 629-640
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • COVID-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary #MMPMID33972746
  • Round T; L'Esperance V; Bayly J; Brain K; Dallas L; Edwards JG; Haswell T; Hiley C; Lovell N; McAdam J; McCutchan G; Nair A; Newsom-Davis T; Sage EK; Navani N
  • Br J Cancer 2021[Aug]; 125 (5): 629-640 PMID33972746show ga
  • Delivering lung cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant and ongoing challenges. There is a lack of published COVID-19 and lung cancer evidence-based reviews, including for the whole patient pathway. We searched for COVID-19 and lung cancer publications and brought together a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders to review and comment on the evidence and challenges. A rapid review of the literature was undertaken up to 28 October 2020, producing 144 papers, with 113 full texts screened. We focused on new primary data collection (qualitative or quantitative evidence) and excluded case reports, editorials and commentaries. Following exclusions, 15 published papers were included in the review and are summarised. They included one qualitative paper and 14 quantitative studies (surveys or cohort studies), with a total of 2295 lung cancer patients data included (mean study size 153 patients; range 7-803). Review of current evidence and commentary included awareness and help-seeking; lung cancer screening; primary care assessment and referral; diagnosis and treatment in secondary care, including oncology and surgery; patient experience and palliative care. Cross-cutting themes and challenges were identified using qualitative methods for patients, healthcare professionals and service delivery, with a clear need for continued studies to guide evidence-based decision-making.
  • |COVID-19/*epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Early Detection of Cancer[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Lung Neoplasms/*diagnosis/*therapy[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box