Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v18.004 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v18.004 33954080!8049777!33954080     free     free     free       Biophys+Physicobiol 2021 ; 18 (ä): 28-39 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33954080|t=2021. Antigen tests for COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{33954080}} gab.com Text Antigen tests for COVID-19 JO: Biophys Physicobiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33954080 #FOAvip PCR diagnosis has been considered as the gold standard for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other many diseases. However, there are many problems in using PCR, such as non-specific (i.e., false-positive) and false-negative amplifications, the limits of a target sample volume, deactivation of the enzymes used, complicated techniques, difficulty in designing probe sequences, and the expense. We, thus, need an alternative to PCR, for example an ultrasensitive antigen test. In the present review, we summarize the following three topics. (1) The problems of PCR are outlined. (2) The antigen tests are surveyed in the literature that was published in 2020, and their pros and cons are discussed for commercially available antigen tests. (3) Our own antigen test on the basis of an ultrasensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is introduced. Finally, we discuss the possibility that our antigen test by an ultrasensitive ELISA technique will become the gold standard for diagnosis of COVID-19 and other diseases. Twit Text FOAVip Antigen tests for COVID-19 ????Biophys Physicobiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33954080 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33954080 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33954080}}</ref> Antigen tests for COVID-19 #MMPMID33954080 Kyosei Y; Yamura S; Namba M; Yoshimura T; Watabe S; Ito E Biophys Physicobiol 2021[]; 18 (ä): 28-39 PMID33954080show ga PCR diagnosis has been considered as the gold standard for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other many diseases. However, there are many problems in using PCR, such as non-specific (i.e., false-positive) and false-negative amplifications, the limits of a target sample volume, deactivation of the enzymes used, complicated techniques, difficulty in designing probe sequences, and the expense. We, thus, need an alternative to PCR, for example an ultrasensitive antigen test. In the present review, we summarize the following three topics. (1) The problems of PCR are outlined. (2) The antigen tests are surveyed in the literature that was published in 2020, and their pros and cons are discussed for commercially available antigen tests. (3) Our own antigen test on the basis of an ultrasensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is introduced. Finally, we discuss the possibility that our antigen test by an ultrasensitive ELISA technique will become the gold standard for diagnosis of COVID-19 and other diseases. äAntigen tests for COVID-19 (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing