Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1017/dmp.2021.136 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1017/dmp.2021.136 33938423!8209443!33938423     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Disaster+Med+Public+Health+Prep 2021 ; ä (ä): 1-24 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33938423|t=2021. A Multi-platform Approach to Monitoring Negative Dominance for COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Information Online |pdf=|usr=}}{{33938423}} gab.com Text A Multi-platform Approach to Monitoring Negative Dominance for COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Information Online JO: Disaster Med Public Health Prep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33938423 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the appearance of negative dominance in COVID-19 vaccine-related information and activity online. We hypothesized that if negative dominance appeared, it would be a reflection of peaks in adverse events related to the vaccine, that negative content would attract more engagement on social media than other vaccine-related posts, and posts referencing adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccination would have a higher average toxicity score. METHODS: We collected data using Google Trends for search behavior, CrowdTangle for social media data, and Media Cloud for media stories, and compared them against the dates of key adverse events related to COVID-19. We used Communalytic to analyze the toxicity of social media posts by platform and topic. RESULTS: While our first hypothesis was partially supported, with peaks in search behavior for image and YouTube videos driven by adverse events, we did not find negative dominance in other types of searches or patterns of attention by news media or on social media. CONCLUSION: We did not find evidence in our data to prove the negative dominance of adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccination on social media. Future studies should corroborate these findings and, if consistent, focus on explaining why this may be the case. Twit Text FOAVip A Multi-platform Approach to Monitoring Negative Dominance for COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Information Online ????Disaster Med Public Health Prep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33938423 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33938423 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33938423}}</ref> A Multi-platform Approach to Monitoring Negative Dominance for COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Information Online #MMPMID33938423 Pascual-Ferra P; Alperstein N; Barnett DJ Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2021[May]; ä (ä): 1-24 PMID33938423show ga OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the appearance of negative dominance in COVID-19 vaccine-related information and activity online. We hypothesized that if negative dominance appeared, it would be a reflection of peaks in adverse events related to the vaccine, that negative content would attract more engagement on social media than other vaccine-related posts, and posts referencing adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccination would have a higher average toxicity score. METHODS: We collected data using Google Trends for search behavior, CrowdTangle for social media data, and Media Cloud for media stories, and compared them against the dates of key adverse events related to COVID-19. We used Communalytic to analyze the toxicity of social media posts by platform and topic. RESULTS: While our first hypothesis was partially supported, with peaks in search behavior for image and YouTube videos driven by adverse events, we did not find negative dominance in other types of searches or patterns of attention by news media or on social media. CONCLUSION: We did not find evidence in our data to prove the negative dominance of adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccination on social media. Future studies should corroborate these findings and, if consistent, focus on explaining why this may be the case. äA Multi-platform Approach to Monitoring Negative Dominance for COVID-1(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing