Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102576 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102576 33915376!8212571!33915376     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Health+Place 2021 ; 69 (ä): 102576 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33915376|t=2021. SARS-CoV-2 testing in North Carolina: Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities |pdf=|usr=}}{{33915376}} gab.com Text SARS-CoV-2 testing in North Carolina: Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities JO: Health Place http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33915376 #FOAvip SARS-CoV-2 testing data in North Carolina during the first three months of the state's COVID-19 pandemic were analyzed to determine if there were disparities among intersecting axes of identity including race, Latinx ethnicity, age, urban-rural residence, and residence in a medically underserved area. Demographic and residential data were used to reconstruct patterns of testing metrics (including tests per capita, positive tests per capita, and test positivity rate which is an indicator of sufficient testing) across race-ethnicity groups and urban-rural populations separately. Across the entire sample, 13.1% (38,750 of 295,642) of tests were positive. Within racial-ethnic groups, 11.5% of all tests were positive among non-Latinx (NL) Whites, 22.0% for NL Blacks, and 66.5% for people of Latinx ethnicity. The test positivity rate was higher among people living in rural areas across all racial-ethnic groups. These results suggest that in the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic, access to COVID-19 testing in North Carolina was not evenly distributed across racial-ethnic groups, especially in Latinx, NL Black and other historically marginalized populations, and further disparities existed within these groups by gender, age, urban-rural status, and residence in a medically underserved area. Twit Text FOAVip SARS-CoV-2 testing in North Carolina: Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities ????Health Place http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33915376 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33915376 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33915376}}</ref> SARS-CoV-2 testing in North Carolina: Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities #MMPMID33915376 Brandt K; Goel V; Keeler C; Bell GJ; Aiello AE; Corbie-Smith G; Wilson E; Fleischauer A; Emch M; Boyce RM Health Place 2021[May]; 69 (ä): 102576 PMID33915376show ga SARS-CoV-2 testing data in North Carolina during the first three months of the state's COVID-19 pandemic were analyzed to determine if there were disparities among intersecting axes of identity including race, Latinx ethnicity, age, urban-rural residence, and residence in a medically underserved area. Demographic and residential data were used to reconstruct patterns of testing metrics (including tests per capita, positive tests per capita, and test positivity rate which is an indicator of sufficient testing) across race-ethnicity groups and urban-rural populations separately. Across the entire sample, 13.1% (38,750 of 295,642) of tests were positive. Within racial-ethnic groups, 11.5% of all tests were positive among non-Latinx (NL) Whites, 22.0% for NL Blacks, and 66.5% for people of Latinx ethnicity. The test positivity rate was higher among people living in rural areas across all racial-ethnic groups. These results suggest that in the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic, access to COVID-19 testing in North Carolina was not evenly distributed across racial-ethnic groups, especially in Latinx, NL Black and other historically marginalized populations, and further disparities existed within these groups by gender, age, urban-rural status, and residence in a medically underserved area. |Adolescent[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Age Distribution[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Black or African American/*statistics & numerical data[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing/*statistics & numerical data[MESH] |COVID-19/*diagnosis[MESH] |Child[MESH] |Child, Preschool[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Healthcare Disparities/*statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Hispanic or Latino/*statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Infant[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |North Carolina[MESH] |Rural Population[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification[MESH] |Urban Population[MESH] |White People/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]SARS-CoV-2 testing in North Carolina: Racial, ethnic, and geographic d(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing