Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1007/s43441-021-00295-8

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s43441-021-00295-8
suck pdf from google scholar
33914298!8082746!33914298
unlimited free pdf from europmc33914298    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33914298      Ther+Innov+Regul+Sci 2021 ; 55 (4): 899-906
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Past, Present, and Future #MMPMID33914298
  • Barnes B; Stansbury N; Brown D; Garson L; Gerard G; Piccoli N; Jendrasek D; May N; Castillo V; Adelfio A; Ramirez N; McSweeney A; Berlien R; Butler PJ
  • Ther Innov Regul Sci 2021[Jul]; 55 (4): 899-906 PMID33914298show ga
  • Risk-based monitoring (RBM) is a powerful tool for efficiently ensuring patient safety and data integrity in a clinical trial, enhancing overall trial quality. To better understand the state of RBM implementation across the clinical trial industry, the Association of Clinical Research Organizations (ACRO) conducted a landscape survey among its member companies across 6,513 clinical trials ongoing at the end of 2019. Of these trials, 22% included at least 1 of the 5 RBM components: key risk indicators (KRIs), centralized monitoring, off-site/remote-site monitoring, reduced source data verification (SDV), and reduced source document review (SDR). The implementation rates for the individual RBM components ranged 8%-19%, with the most frequently implemented component being centralized monitoring and the least frequently implemented being reduced SDR. When the COVID-19 pandemic emerged in early 2020, additional data were collected to assess its impact on trial monitoring, focusing specifically on trials switching from on-site monitoring to off-site/remote-site monitoring. These mid-pandemic data show that the vast majority of monitoring visits were on-site in February 2020, but an even higher percentage were off-site in April, corresponding with the first peak of the pandemic. Despite this shift, similar numbers of non-COVID-related protocol deviations were detected from February through June, suggesting little or no reduction in monitoring effectiveness. The pre- and mid-pandemic data provide two very different snapshots of RBM implementation, but both support the need to promote adoption of this approach while also highlighting an opportunity to capitalize on the recent shift toward greater RBM uptake in a post-pandemic environment.
  • |*COVID-19[MESH]
  • |*Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Patient Safety[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box