Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1080/23294515.2021.1907474 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1080/23294515.2021.1907474 33881385!ä!33881385 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       AJOB+Empir+Bioeth 2021 ; 12 (3): 155-163 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33881385|t=2021. Priority Setting of Ventilators in the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Public s Perspective |pdf=|usr=}}{{33881385}} gab.com Text Priority Setting of Ventilators in the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Public s Perspective JO: AJOB Empir Bioeth http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33881385 #FOAvip Background: Ventilator allocation plan for a public health crisis should be developed through recognizing the values of society and engaging the general public. This study was conducted to assess the Iranian citizens' attitude about some principles and criteria for allocation of ventilators in the current COVID-19 epidemic.Materials and Methods: An electronic self-administered questionnaire was publicly distributed through social networks of Telegram and WhatsApp to perform this cross-sectional study. The questionnaire consisted of 11 statements about the selection and prioritization of patients for the use of a ventilator.Results: 1262 persons, including 767 citizens and 495 health care providers participated in this study. More than 95% of participants agreed upon the necessity to avoid discrimination and avoid prioritization according to patients' gender, economic and political status. While 40.9% of citizens and 49.6% of healthcare workers believed that a ventilator can be disconnected from a patient with a poor prognosis to help another patient who has a better prognosis (P-value = 0.13), 34.3% of people and 29.6% of healthcare workers believed that the earlier admitted patients have the right to receive the device even if the likeliness of his/her survival is less than the next patient (P-value = 0.009).Conclusions: Maximizing health benefits as a measure of ventilator allocation in the pandemic of COVID-19 is an accepted criterion. Meanwhile, periodic evaluation of patients and disconnecting the device from a patient that no longer benefits from ICU services requires its scientific and ethical basis to be brought in public discourse. Twit Text FOAVip Priority Setting of Ventilators in the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Public s Perspective ????AJOB Empir Bioeth http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33881385 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33881385 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33881385}}</ref> Priority Setting of Ventilators in the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Public s Perspective #MMPMID33881385 Asghari F; Parsapour A; Shamsi Gooshki E AJOB Empir Bioeth 2021[Jul]; 12 (3): 155-163 PMID33881385show ga Background: Ventilator allocation plan for a public health crisis should be developed through recognizing the values of society and engaging the general public. This study was conducted to assess the Iranian citizens' attitude about some principles and criteria for allocation of ventilators in the current COVID-19 epidemic.Materials and Methods: An electronic self-administered questionnaire was publicly distributed through social networks of Telegram and WhatsApp to perform this cross-sectional study. The questionnaire consisted of 11 statements about the selection and prioritization of patients for the use of a ventilator.Results: 1262 persons, including 767 citizens and 495 health care providers participated in this study. More than 95% of participants agreed upon the necessity to avoid discrimination and avoid prioritization according to patients' gender, economic and political status. While 40.9% of citizens and 49.6% of healthcare workers believed that a ventilator can be disconnected from a patient with a poor prognosis to help another patient who has a better prognosis (P-value = 0.13), 34.3% of people and 29.6% of healthcare workers believed that the earlier admitted patients have the right to receive the device even if the likeliness of his/her survival is less than the next patient (P-value = 0.009).Conclusions: Maximizing health benefits as a measure of ventilator allocation in the pandemic of COVID-19 is an accepted criterion. Meanwhile, periodic evaluation of patients and disconnecting the device from a patient that no longer benefits from ICU services requires its scientific and ethical basis to be brought in public discourse. |*Public Opinion[MESH] |*Resource Allocation[MESH] |*Ventilators, Mechanical[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |COVID-19/*epidemiology[MESH] |Cross-Sectional Studies[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Iran/epidemiology[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH]Priority Setting of Ventilators in the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Publ(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing