Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.7554/eLife.65726 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7554/eLife.65726 33876726!8081522!33876726     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33876726&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Elife 2021 ; 10 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33876726|t=2021. Sensitivity of ID NOW and RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an ambulatory population |pdf=|usr=}}{{33876726}} gab.com Text Sensitivity of ID NOW and RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an ambulatory population JO: Elife http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33876726 #FOAvip Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) requires confirmation by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Abbott ID NOW provides fast results but has been criticized for low sensitivity. Here we determine the sensitivity of ID NOW in an ambulatory population presented for testing. The study enrolled 785 symptomatic patients, of whom 21 were positive by both ID NOW and RT-PCR, and 2 only by RT-PCR. All 189 asymptomatic patients tested negative. The positive percent agreement between the ID NOW assay and the RT-PCR assay was 91.3%, and negative percent agreement was 100%. The results from the current study were included into a larger systematic review of literature where at least 20 subjects were simultaneously tested using ID NOW and RT-PCR. The overall sensitivity for ID NOW assay was calculated at 84% (95% confidence interval 55-96%) and had the highest correlation to RT-PCR at viral loads most likely to be associated with transmissible infections. Twit Text FOAVip Sensitivity of ID NOW and RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an ambulatory population ????Elife http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33876726 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33876726 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33876726}}</ref> Sensitivity of ID NOW and RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an ambulatory population #MMPMID33876726 Tu YP; Iqbal J; O'Leary T Elife 2021[Apr]; 10 (ä): ä PMID33876726show ga Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) requires confirmation by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Abbott ID NOW provides fast results but has been criticized for low sensitivity. Here we determine the sensitivity of ID NOW in an ambulatory population presented for testing. The study enrolled 785 symptomatic patients, of whom 21 were positive by both ID NOW and RT-PCR, and 2 only by RT-PCR. All 189 asymptomatic patients tested negative. The positive percent agreement between the ID NOW assay and the RT-PCR assay was 91.3%, and negative percent agreement was 100%. The results from the current study were included into a larger systematic review of literature where at least 20 subjects were simultaneously tested using ID NOW and RT-PCR. The overall sensitivity for ID NOW assay was calculated at 84% (95% confidence interval 55-96%) and had the highest correlation to RT-PCR at viral loads most likely to be associated with transmissible infections. |Adult[MESH] |COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/*methods[MESH] |COVID-19/*diagnosis[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Genome, Viral[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Nose/virology[MESH] |Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods[MESH] |Point-of-Care Systems[MESH] |Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/*methods[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2/genetics/*isolation & purification[MESH] |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH] |Specimen Handling[MESH]Sensitivity of ID NOW and RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an amb(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing