Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1515/dx-2021-0034 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1515/dx-2021-0034 33873262!ä!33873262 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Diagnosis+(Berl) 2021 ; 8 (4): 446-449 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33873262|t=2021. Are sniffer dogs a reliable approach for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection?|pdf=|usr=}}{{33873262}} gab.com Text Are sniffer dogs a reliable approach for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection JO: Diagnosis (Berl) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33873262 #FOAvip OBJECTIVES: Despite inter-individual variations in their diagnostic efficiency, dogs have been trained to investigate many human pathologies, especially cancer, diabetes, migraine, seizures and even infectious diseases. To this end, we performed a critical review and pooled analysis of current scientific literature on the performance of dogs trained for identifying severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive human specimens. METHODS: We carried out an electronic search in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science with the keywords "dog(s)" AND "sniffer" OR "scent" OR "smell" AND "SARS-CoV-2" OR "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2" OR "coronavirus disease 2019" OR "COVID-19" within all fields, without date or language restrictions, to identify studies describing dogs' performance for identifying SARS-CoV-2 infected material. RESULTS: Three studies could be finally included in pooled analysis, totaling 17 dogs (47% females), aged between 0.5 and 12 years. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.91; I(2), 85.3%), the diagnostic specificity 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-0.99; I(2), 97.4%), whilst the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was 0.979 (standard error, 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The notable performance observed in this pooled analysis would persuade us to suggest that adequately trained dogs could represent an intriguing and sustainable resource for purposes of rapid SARS-CoV-2 mass screening. Twit Text FOAVip Are sniffer dogs a reliable approach for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection ????Diagnosis (Berl) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33873262 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33873262 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33873262}}</ref> Are sniffer dogs a reliable approach for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection? #MMPMID33873262 Lippi G; Mattiuzzi C; Henry BM Diagnosis (Berl) 2021[Nov]; 8 (4): 446-449 PMID33873262show ga OBJECTIVES: Despite inter-individual variations in their diagnostic efficiency, dogs have been trained to investigate many human pathologies, especially cancer, diabetes, migraine, seizures and even infectious diseases. To this end, we performed a critical review and pooled analysis of current scientific literature on the performance of dogs trained for identifying severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive human specimens. METHODS: We carried out an electronic search in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science with the keywords "dog(s)" AND "sniffer" OR "scent" OR "smell" AND "SARS-CoV-2" OR "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2" OR "coronavirus disease 2019" OR "COVID-19" within all fields, without date or language restrictions, to identify studies describing dogs' performance for identifying SARS-CoV-2 infected material. RESULTS: Three studies could be finally included in pooled analysis, totaling 17 dogs (47% females), aged between 0.5 and 12 years. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.91; I(2), 85.3%), the diagnostic specificity 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-0.99; I(2), 97.4%), whilst the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was 0.979 (standard error, 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The notable performance observed in this pooled analysis would persuade us to suggest that adequately trained dogs could represent an intriguing and sustainable resource for purposes of rapid SARS-CoV-2 mass screening. |*COVID-19[MESH] |Animals[MESH] |Dogs[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]Are sniffer dogs a reliable approach for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infecti(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing