Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/hpja.494 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/hpja.494 33864299!8250613!33864299     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Health+Promot+J+Austr 2022 ; 33 (2): 311-319 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33864299|t=2022. Positive outcomes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia |pdf=|usr=}}{{33864299}} gab.com Text Positive outcomes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia JO: Health Promot J Austr http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33864299 #FOAvip ISSUE ADDRESSED: To investigate whether Australians have experienced any positive effects during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: National online longitudinal survey. As part of a June 2020 survey, participants (n = 1370) were asked 'In your life, have you experienced any positive effects from the COVID-19 pandemic' (yes/no) and also completed the World Health Organisation-Five well-being index. Differences were explored by demographic variables. Free-text responses were thematically coded. RESULTS: Nine hundred sixty participants (70%) reported experiencing at least one positive effect during the COVID-19 pandemic. Living with others (P = .045) and employment situation (P < .001) at baseline (April) were associated with experiencing positive effects. Individuals working for pay from home were more likely to experience positive effects compared to those who were not working for pay (aOR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.63, P < .001) or who were working for pay outside the home (aOR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.58, P < .001). 54.2% of participants reported a sufficient level of well-being, 23.2% low well-being and a further 22.6% very low well-being. Of those experiencing positive effects, 945/960 (98%) provided an explanation. The three most common themes were 'Family time' (33%), 'Work flexibility' (29%) and 'Calmer life' (19%). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of participants reported positive effects resulting from changes to daily life due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. SO WHAT: The needs of people living alone, and of those having to work outside the home or who are unemployed, should be considered by health policymakers and employers in future pandemic preparedness efforts. Twit Text FOAVip Positive outcomes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia ????Health Promot J Austr http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33864299 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33864299 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33864299}}</ref> Positive outcomes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia #MMPMID33864299 Cornell S; Nickel B; Cvejic E; Bonner C; McCaffery KJ; Ayre J; Copp T; Batcup C; Isautier J; Dakin T; Dodd R Health Promot J Austr 2022[Apr]; 33 (2): 311-319 PMID33864299show ga ISSUE ADDRESSED: To investigate whether Australians have experienced any positive effects during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: National online longitudinal survey. As part of a June 2020 survey, participants (n = 1370) were asked 'In your life, have you experienced any positive effects from the COVID-19 pandemic' (yes/no) and also completed the World Health Organisation-Five well-being index. Differences were explored by demographic variables. Free-text responses were thematically coded. RESULTS: Nine hundred sixty participants (70%) reported experiencing at least one positive effect during the COVID-19 pandemic. Living with others (P = .045) and employment situation (P < .001) at baseline (April) were associated with experiencing positive effects. Individuals working for pay from home were more likely to experience positive effects compared to those who were not working for pay (aOR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.63, P < .001) or who were working for pay outside the home (aOR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.58, P < .001). 54.2% of participants reported a sufficient level of well-being, 23.2% low well-being and a further 22.6% very low well-being. Of those experiencing positive effects, 945/960 (98%) provided an explanation. The three most common themes were 'Family time' (33%), 'Work flexibility' (29%) and 'Calmer life' (19%). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of participants reported positive effects resulting from changes to daily life due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. SO WHAT: The needs of people living alone, and of those having to work outside the home or who are unemployed, should be considered by health policymakers and employers in future pandemic preparedness efforts. |*COVID-19/epidemiology[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |Australia/epidemiology[MESH] |Employment[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Positive outcomes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing