Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1136/medethics-2021-107361 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/medethics-2021-107361 33863831!8054825!33863831     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Med+Ethics 2021 ; ä (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33863831|t=2021. Human rights and COVID-19 triage: a comment on the Bath protocol |pdf=|usr=}}{{33863831}} gab.com Text Human rights and COVID-19 triage: a comment on the Bath protocol JO: J Med Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33863831 #FOAvip In their discussion paper of November 2020, Cook et al present a draft protocol for navigating circumstances in which emergency services are overwhelmed. Their paper suggests that COVID-related triage decisions should be based on clinical assessment, patient and family consultation, and a range of ethical considerations. In this response, we note that the protocol exhibits an ambiguity that is likely to result in irresolvable dilemmas when put into practice. This ambiguity is exemplified in the paper's prime ethical imperative (to 'save more lives and more years of life'), which takes the form of an undefined conjunction whose practical implications are left unspecified. We see this ambiguity in the prime imperative as one manifestation of a broader set of tensions in the protocol. We show that the discipline of human rights provides an essential supplement to the ethical framework on which Cook and colleagues rely, providing a framework for understanding and working through triage dilemmas involving age, discrimination and equality. Twit Text FOAVip Human rights and COVID-19 triage: a comment on the Bath protocol ????J Med Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33863831 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33863831 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33863831}}</ref> Human rights and COVID-19 triage: a comment on the Bath protocol #MMPMID33863831 Bhatt V; Michalowski S; Wyllie A; Kuylen M; Martin W J Med Ethics 2021[Apr]; ä (ä): ä PMID33863831show ga In their discussion paper of November 2020, Cook et al present a draft protocol for navigating circumstances in which emergency services are overwhelmed. Their paper suggests that COVID-related triage decisions should be based on clinical assessment, patient and family consultation, and a range of ethical considerations. In this response, we note that the protocol exhibits an ambiguity that is likely to result in irresolvable dilemmas when put into practice. This ambiguity is exemplified in the paper's prime ethical imperative (to 'save more lives and more years of life'), which takes the form of an undefined conjunction whose practical implications are left unspecified. We see this ambiguity in the prime imperative as one manifestation of a broader set of tensions in the protocol. We show that the discipline of human rights provides an essential supplement to the ethical framework on which Cook and colleagues rely, providing a framework for understanding and working through triage dilemmas involving age, discrimination and equality. äHuman rights and COVID-19 triage: a comment on the Bath protocol (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing