Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103017

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103017
suck pdf from google scholar
33857782!8403130!33857782
unlimited free pdf from europmc33857782    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33857782&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33857782      Am+J+Otolaryngol 2021 ; 42 (5): 103017
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • N95 respirator reuse, decontamination methods, and microbial burden: A randomized controlled trial #MMPMID33857782
  • Jiang ZY; Huang Z; Schmale I; Brown EL; Lorenz MC; Patlovich SJ; Goswami K; Wilson HB; Ahmad J; Alexander R; Bryan W; Burke L; Citardi MJ; Elias J; Ho T; Jacob J; Low G; Miramon P; Patki AU; Yao WC; Luong AU
  • Am J Otolaryngol 2021[Sep]; 42 (5): 103017 PMID33857782show ga
  • PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and ease of N95 respirator decontamination methods in a clinic setting and to identify the extent of microbial colonization on respirators associated with reuse. METHODS: In a prospective fashion, N95 respirators (n = 15) were randomized to a decontamination process (time, dry heat, or ultraviolet C light [UVC]) in outpatient clinics. Each respirator was re-used up to 5 separate clinic sessions. Swabs on each respirator for SARS-CoV-2, bacteria, and fungi were obtained before clinic, after clinic and post-treatment. Mask integrity was checked after each treatment (n = 68). Statistical analyses were performed to determine factors for positive samples. RESULTS: All three decontamination processes reduced bacteria counts similarly. On multivariate mixed model analysis, there were an additional 8.1 colonies of bacteria (95% CI 5.7 to 10.5; p < 0.01) on the inside compared to the outside surface of the respirators. Treatment resulted in a decrease of bacterial load by 8.6 colonies (95% CI -11.6 to -5.5; p < 0.01). Although no decontamination treatment affected the respirator filtration efficiency, heat treatments were associated with the breakdown of thermoplastic elastomer straps. Contamination with fungal and SARS-CoV-2 viral particles were minimal to non-existent. CONCLUSIONS: Time, heat and UVC all reduced bacterial load on reused N95 respirators. Fungal contamination was minimal. Heat could permanently damage some elastic straps making the respirators nonfunctional. Given its effectiveness against microbes, lack of damage to re-treated respirators and logistical ease, UVC represents an optimal decontamination method for individual N95 respirators when reuse is necessary.
  • |*Equipment Reuse[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*prevention & control/transmission[MESH]
  • |Colony Count, Microbial[MESH]
  • |Decontamination/*methods[MESH]
  • |Hot Temperature[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/*prevention & control[MESH]
  • |N95 Respirators/*microbiology[MESH]
  • |Prospective Studies[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2/*isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |Time Factors[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box