Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.2105/AJPH.2021.306237 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306237 33856883!8101570!33856883     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Am+J+Public+Health 2021 ; 111 (6): 1164-1167 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33856883|t=2021. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Correctional Staff in the Federal Bureau of Prisons |pdf=|usr=}}{{33856883}} gab.com Text SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Correctional Staff in the Federal Bureau of Prisons JO: Am J Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33856883 #FOAvip Objectives. To examine SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) epidemiology and risk factors among Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff in the United States.Methods. We calculated the SARS-CoV-2 case rate among 37 640 BOP staff from March 12 to June 17, 2020, using payroll and COVID-19-specific data. We compared occupational factors among staff with and without known SARS-CoV-2 using multiple logistic regression, controlling for demographic characteristics. We calculated relative risk among staff in stand-alone institutions versus complexes (> 1 institution).Results. SARS-CoV-2 was reported by 665 staff across 59.8% of institutions, a case rate of 1766.6 per 100 000. Working in dorm-style housing and in detention centers were strong risk factors, whereas cell-based housing was protective; these effects were erased in complexes. Occupational category was not associated with SARS-CoV-2.Conclusions. SARS-CoV-2 infection was more likely among staff working in institutions where physical distancing and limiting exposure to a consistent set of staff and inmates are challenging.Public Health Implications. Mitigation strategies-including augmented staff testing, entry and exit testing among inmates, limiting staff interactions across complexes, and increasing physical distancing by reducing occupancy in dorm-style housing-may prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections among correctional staff. Twit Text FOAVip SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Correctional Staff in the Federal Bureau of Prisons ????Am J Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33856883 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33856883 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33856883}}</ref> SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Correctional Staff in the Federal Bureau of Prisons #MMPMID33856883 Toblin RL; Cohen SI; Hagan LM Am J Public Health 2021[Jun]; 111 (6): 1164-1167 PMID33856883show ga Objectives. To examine SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) epidemiology and risk factors among Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff in the United States.Methods. We calculated the SARS-CoV-2 case rate among 37 640 BOP staff from March 12 to June 17, 2020, using payroll and COVID-19-specific data. We compared occupational factors among staff with and without known SARS-CoV-2 using multiple logistic regression, controlling for demographic characteristics. We calculated relative risk among staff in stand-alone institutions versus complexes (> 1 institution).Results. SARS-CoV-2 was reported by 665 staff across 59.8% of institutions, a case rate of 1766.6 per 100 000. Working in dorm-style housing and in detention centers were strong risk factors, whereas cell-based housing was protective; these effects were erased in complexes. Occupational category was not associated with SARS-CoV-2.Conclusions. SARS-CoV-2 infection was more likely among staff working in institutions where physical distancing and limiting exposure to a consistent set of staff and inmates are challenging.Public Health Implications. Mitigation strategies-including augmented staff testing, entry and exit testing among inmates, limiting staff interactions across complexes, and increasing physical distancing by reducing occupancy in dorm-style housing-may prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections among correctional staff. |*Prisons[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing[MESH] |COVID-19/*epidemiology/transmission[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Infection Control/*organization & administration[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Occupational Health/*standards[MESH] |Risk Factors[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2/*isolation & purification[MESH] |Social Isolation[MESH]SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Correctional Staff in the Federal Bureau of(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing