Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/ijcp.14215 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/ijcp.14215 33848383!8250060!33848383     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33848383&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Int+J+Clin+Pract 2021 ; 75 (9): e14215 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33848383|t=2021. A pre-systematic review on the use of masks as a protection material for SARS-COV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{33848383}} gab.com Text A pre-systematic review on the use of masks as a protection material for SARS-COV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic JO: Int J Clin Pract http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33848383 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in Wuhan, China on 31 December 2019. AIMS: to review, analyse and discuss all works about the wearing and development of facemasks as potential protection against SARS-COV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: PubMed, SciELO, Google Scholar and DOAJ were browsed. KEYWORDS: "mask and (SARS or Cov)" (1 August 2019 to 12 April 2020). INCLUSION CRITERIA: original research. PRISMA criteria were followed. RESULTS: Twenty-one works were selected. Identified topics: effectiveness of protective equipment/devices (PE) (n = 3), universal wearing of facemasks plus other protective measures in the community (n = 3), impact of infection control measures on hospitals and epidemiological tracing (n = 3), development of new PE (n = 2), sanitisation of facemasks (n = 4), clinical guidance (n = 4) and questionnaires (n = 2). DISCUSSION: It seems that the effectiveness of PE, namely facemasks, is not fully known. Universal wearing of facemasks may be simultaneously recommended with other protective measures. Nosocomial and community infections seem to be preventable. New PE, methods of facemask sanitisation and clinical guidance are emerging, but caution is recommended regarding their adoption, revision and monitoring by international boards and institutions. Questionnaires are useful tools for collecting citizens' opinions on implementing public health measures, and thus contribute to mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Universal wearing of facemasks in the community is likely to be recommended during the COVID-19pandemic. Since SARS-COV-2 is highly contagious, a set of measures should be considered. Facemask sanitisation is possible, but standardised procedures are lacking. New PE is emerging and requires detailed regulatory approval. It is advisable to monitor public opinion. Twit Text FOAVip A pre-systematic review on the use of masks as a protection material for SARS-COV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic ????Int J Clin Pract http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33848383 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33848383 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33848383}}</ref> A pre-systematic review on the use of masks as a protection material for SARS-COV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic #MMPMID33848383 Pires C Int J Clin Pract 2021[Sep]; 75 (9): e14215 PMID33848383show ga BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in Wuhan, China on 31 December 2019. AIMS: to review, analyse and discuss all works about the wearing and development of facemasks as potential protection against SARS-COV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: PubMed, SciELO, Google Scholar and DOAJ were browsed. KEYWORDS: "mask and (SARS or Cov)" (1 August 2019 to 12 April 2020). INCLUSION CRITERIA: original research. PRISMA criteria were followed. RESULTS: Twenty-one works were selected. Identified topics: effectiveness of protective equipment/devices (PE) (n = 3), universal wearing of facemasks plus other protective measures in the community (n = 3), impact of infection control measures on hospitals and epidemiological tracing (n = 3), development of new PE (n = 2), sanitisation of facemasks (n = 4), clinical guidance (n = 4) and questionnaires (n = 2). DISCUSSION: It seems that the effectiveness of PE, namely facemasks, is not fully known. Universal wearing of facemasks may be simultaneously recommended with other protective measures. Nosocomial and community infections seem to be preventable. New PE, methods of facemask sanitisation and clinical guidance are emerging, but caution is recommended regarding their adoption, revision and monitoring by international boards and institutions. Questionnaires are useful tools for collecting citizens' opinions on implementing public health measures, and thus contribute to mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Universal wearing of facemasks in the community is likely to be recommended during the COVID-19pandemic. Since SARS-COV-2 is highly contagious, a set of measures should be considered. Facemask sanitisation is possible, but standardised procedures are lacking. New PE is emerging and requires detailed regulatory approval. It is advisable to monitor public opinion. |*COVID-19/prevention & control[MESH] |*Masks[MESH] |*Pandemics/prevention & control[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Infection Control[MESH]A pre-systematic review on the use of masks as a protection material f(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing