Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7943

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7943
suck pdf from google scholar
33835172!8035644!33835172
unlimited free pdf from europmc33835172    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33835172      JAMA+Netw+Open 2021 ; 4 (4): e217943
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Public Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccine Prioritization #MMPMID33835172
  • Persad G; Emanuel EJ; Sangenito S; Glickman A; Phillips S; Largent EA
  • JAMA Netw Open 2021[Apr]; 4 (4): e217943 PMID33835172show ga
  • IMPORTANCE: As COVID-19 vaccine distribution continues, policy makers are struggling to decide which groups should be prioritized for vaccination. OBJECTIVE: To assess US adults' preferences regarding COVID-19 vaccine prioritization. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This survey study involved 2 independent, online surveys of US adults aged 18 years and older, 1 conducted by Gallup from September 14 to 27, 2020, and the other conducted by the COVID Collaborative from September 19 to 25, 2020. Samples were weighted to reflect sociodemographic characteristics of the US population. EXPOSURES: Respondents were asked to prioritize groups for COVID-19 vaccine and to rank their prioritization considerations. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The study assessed prioritization preferences and agreement with the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine's Preliminary Framework for Equitable Allocation of COVID-19 Vaccine. RESULTS: A total of 4735 individuals participated, 2730 (1474 men [54.1%]; mean [SD] age, 59.2 [14.5] years) in the Gallup survey and 2005 (944 men [47.1%]; 203 participants [21.5%] aged 55-59 years) in the COVID Collaborative survey. In both the Gallup COVID-19 Panel and COVID Collaborative surveys, respondents listed health care workers (Gallup, 93.6% [95% CI, 91.2%-95.3%]; COVID Collaborative, 80.0% [95% CI, 78.0%-81.9%]) and adults of any age with serious comorbid conditions (Gallup, 78.6% [95% CI, 75.2%-81.7%]; COVID Collaborative, 72.9% [95% CI, 70.7%-74.9%]) among their 4 highest priority groups. Respondents of all political affiliations agreed with prioritizing Black, Hispanic, Native American, and other communities that have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19 (Gallup, 74.2% [95% CI, 70.6%-77.5%]; COVID Collaborative, 84.9% [95% CI, 83.1%-86.5%]), and COVID Collaborative respondents were willing to be preceded in line by teachers and childcare workers (92.5%; 95% CI, 91.2%-93.7%) and grocery workers (85.9%; 95% CI, 84.2%-87.5%). Older respondents in both surveys were significantly less likely than younger respondents to prioritize healthy adults aged 65 years and older among their 4 highest priority groups (Gallup, 23.7% vs 39.1% [chi2 = 2160.8; P < .001]; COVID Collaborative, 23.3% vs 28.8% [chi2 = 5.0198; P = .03]). COVID Collaborative respondents believed the 4 most important considerations for prioritization were preventing COVID-19 spread (78.4% [95% CI, 76.3%-80.3%]), preventing the most deaths (72.1% [95% CI, 69.9%-74.2%]), preventing long-term complications (68.9% [66.6%-71.9%]), and protecting frontline workers (63.8% [95% CI, 61.5%-66.1%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: US adults broadly agreed with the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine's prioritization framework. Respondents endorsed prioritizing racial/ethnic communities that are disproportionately affected by COVID-19, and older respondents were significantly less likely than younger respondents to endorse prioritizing healthy people older than 65 years. This provides reason for caution about COVID-19 vaccine distribution plans that prioritize healthy adults older than a cutoff age without including those younger than that age with preexisting conditions, that aim solely to prevent the most deaths, or that give no priority to frontline workers or disproportionately affected communities.
  • |*Attitude to Health[MESH]
  • |*Public Opinion[MESH]
  • |Adolescent[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |COVID-19 Vaccines/*therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Ethnicity/psychology[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Health Priorities[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Mass Vaccination/*psychology[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Minority Groups/psychology[MESH]
  • |Racial Groups/psychology[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Surveys and Questionnaires[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box