Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1371/journal.pone.0249732 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1371/journal.pone.0249732 33831093!8031244!33831093     free     free     free       PLoS+One 2021 ; 16 (4): e0249732 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33831093|t=2021. The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden |pdf=|usr=}}{{33831093}} gab.com Text The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden JO: PLoS One http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33831093 #FOAvip While most countries imposed a lockdown in response to the first wave of COVID-19 infections, Sweden did not. To quantify the lockdown effect, we approximate a counterfactual lockdown scenario for Sweden through the outcome in a synthetic control unit. We find, first, that a 9-week lockdown in the first half of 2020 would have reduced infections and deaths by about 75% and 38%, respectively. Second, the lockdown effect starts to materialize with a delay of 3-4 weeks only. Third, the actual adjustment of mobility patterns in Sweden suggests there has been substantial voluntary social restraint, although the adjustment was less strong than under the lockdown scenario. Lastly, we find that a lockdown would not have caused much additional output loss. Twit Text FOAVip The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden ????PLoS One http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33831093 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33831093 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33831093}}</ref> The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden #MMPMID33831093 Born B; Dietrich AM; Muller GJ PLoS One 2021[]; 16 (4): e0249732 PMID33831093show ga While most countries imposed a lockdown in response to the first wave of COVID-19 infections, Sweden did not. To quantify the lockdown effect, we approximate a counterfactual lockdown scenario for Sweden through the outcome in a synthetic control unit. We find, first, that a 9-week lockdown in the first half of 2020 would have reduced infections and deaths by about 75% and 38%, respectively. Second, the lockdown effect starts to materialize with a delay of 3-4 weeks only. Third, the actual adjustment of mobility patterns in Sweden suggests there has been substantial voluntary social restraint, although the adjustment was less strong than under the lockdown scenario. Lastly, we find that a lockdown would not have caused much additional output loss. |*Models, Biological[MESH] |*Quarantine[MESH] |*SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |COVID-19/*epidemiology/*prevention & control[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH]The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing