Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1038/s41436-021-01157-2 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/s41436-021-01157-2 33824504!8023774!33824504     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33824504&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Genet+Med 2021 ; 23 (8): 1450-1457 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33824504|t=2021. Patients and professionals perspective of non-in-person visits in hereditary cancer: predictors and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{33824504}} gab.com Text Patients and professionals perspective of non-in-person visits in hereditary cancer: predictors and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic JO: Genet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33824504 #FOAvip PURPOSE: To identify predictors of patient acceptance of non-in-person cancer genetic visits before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the preferences of health-care professionals. METHODS: Prospective multicenter cohort study (N = 578, 1 February 2018-20 April 2019) and recontacted during the COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020. Health-care professionals participated in May 2020. Association of personality traits and clinical factors with acceptance was assessed with multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Before COVID-19, videoconference was more accepted than telephone-based visits (28% vs. 16% pretest, 30% vs. 19% post-test). Predictors for telephone visits were age (pretest, odds ratio [OR] 10-year increment = 0.79; post-test OR 10Y = 0.78); disclosure of panel testing (OR = 0.60), positive results (OR = 0.52), low conscientiousness group (OR = 2.87), and post-test level of uncertainty (OR = 0.93). Predictors for videoconference were age (pretest, OR 10Y = 0.73; post-test, OR 10Y = 0.75), educational level (pretest: OR = 1.61), low neuroticism (pretest, OR = 1.72), and post-test level of uncertainty (OR = 0.96). Patients' reported acceptance for non-in-person visits after COVID-19 increased to 92% for the pretest and 85% for the post-test. Health-care professionals only preferred non-in-person visits for disclosure of negative results (83%). CONCLUSION: These new delivery models need to recognize challenges associated with age and the psychological characteristics of the population and embrace health-care professionals' preferences. Twit Text FOAVip Patients and professionals perspective of non-in-person visits in hereditary cancer: predictors and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic ????Genet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33824504 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33824504 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33824504}}</ref> Patients and professionals perspective of non-in-person visits in hereditary cancer: predictors and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic #MMPMID33824504 Lopez-Fernandez A; Villacampa G; Grau E; Salinas M; Darder E; Carrasco E; Torres-Esquius S; Iglesias S; Solanes A; Gadea N; Velasco A; Urgell G; Torres M; Tuset N; Brunet J; Corbella S; Balmana J Genet Med 2021[Aug]; 23 (8): 1450-1457 PMID33824504show ga PURPOSE: To identify predictors of patient acceptance of non-in-person cancer genetic visits before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the preferences of health-care professionals. METHODS: Prospective multicenter cohort study (N = 578, 1 February 2018-20 April 2019) and recontacted during the COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020. Health-care professionals participated in May 2020. Association of personality traits and clinical factors with acceptance was assessed with multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Before COVID-19, videoconference was more accepted than telephone-based visits (28% vs. 16% pretest, 30% vs. 19% post-test). Predictors for telephone visits were age (pretest, odds ratio [OR] 10-year increment = 0.79; post-test OR 10Y = 0.78); disclosure of panel testing (OR = 0.60), positive results (OR = 0.52), low conscientiousness group (OR = 2.87), and post-test level of uncertainty (OR = 0.93). Predictors for videoconference were age (pretest, OR 10Y = 0.73; post-test, OR 10Y = 0.75), educational level (pretest: OR = 1.61), low neuroticism (pretest, OR = 1.72), and post-test level of uncertainty (OR = 0.96). Patients' reported acceptance for non-in-person visits after COVID-19 increased to 92% for the pretest and 85% for the post-test. Health-care professionals only preferred non-in-person visits for disclosure of negative results (83%). CONCLUSION: These new delivery models need to recognize challenges associated with age and the psychological characteristics of the population and embrace health-care professionals' preferences. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Neoplasms[MESH] |Cohort Studies[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control[MESH] |Genetic Predisposition to Disease[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Prospective Studies[MESH]Patients and professionals perspective of non-in-person visits in he(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing