Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/hfm.20891 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/hfm.20891 33821128!8014735!33821128     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Hum+Factors+Ergon+Manuf 2021 ; 31 (4): 349-359 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33821128|t=2021. Aiding decision makers to reopening of places of worship |pdf=|usr=}}{{33821128}} gab.com Text Aiding decision makers to reopening of places of worship JO: Hum Factors Ergon Manuf http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33821128 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: Our research objective is to work with leaders of houses of worship in the local community to assess options for the physically reopening of places of worship. METHOD: This study consists of two parts. The first part consists of working with a leader of a house of worship to formulate a decision process based on the priorities of the organization and its physical size and population. The second part involves the modeling of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus spread within a physical space to provide the leadership of the house of worship an estimate of the outcomes of deciding on various courses of action. The model is a modification of a standard virus model developed for the NetLogo programming environment. RESULTS: The team worked with a large local church in Pennsylvania to physically reopen a worship service. Based on the questionnaire data, the congregation did not prefer the strongest form of the SARS-CoV-2 virus mitigation (mask wearing and social distancing) but favored either mask required and no social distancing or masks optional and social distancing. The team simulated conditions representative of the church and found that social distancing is the key factor to mitigate spread. CONCLUSION: Given the preferences of the congregation, our simulation results suggested that one of the favored options would likely yield a large number of infections (>10% in a scenario with an asymptomatic carrier). This information was provided to the leadership to guide their decision-making for the coming months as poor weather will rule out outdoor worship as a viable option. Twit Text FOAVip Aiding decision makers to reopening of places of worship ????Hum Factors Ergon Manuf http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33821128 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33821128 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33821128}}</ref> Aiding decision makers to reopening of places of worship #MMPMID33821128 Rothrock L; Abraham A; Graf A; Rodopman M; Nold D Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 2021[Jul]; 31 (4): 349-359 PMID33821128show ga OBJECTIVE: Our research objective is to work with leaders of houses of worship in the local community to assess options for the physically reopening of places of worship. METHOD: This study consists of two parts. The first part consists of working with a leader of a house of worship to formulate a decision process based on the priorities of the organization and its physical size and population. The second part involves the modeling of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus spread within a physical space to provide the leadership of the house of worship an estimate of the outcomes of deciding on various courses of action. The model is a modification of a standard virus model developed for the NetLogo programming environment. RESULTS: The team worked with a large local church in Pennsylvania to physically reopen a worship service. Based on the questionnaire data, the congregation did not prefer the strongest form of the SARS-CoV-2 virus mitigation (mask wearing and social distancing) but favored either mask required and no social distancing or masks optional and social distancing. The team simulated conditions representative of the church and found that social distancing is the key factor to mitigate spread. CONCLUSION: Given the preferences of the congregation, our simulation results suggested that one of the favored options would likely yield a large number of infections (>10% in a scenario with an asymptomatic carrier). This information was provided to the leadership to guide their decision-making for the coming months as poor weather will rule out outdoor worship as a viable option. äAiding decision makers to reopening of places of worship (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing