Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.jcot.2021.03.016

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.03.016
suck pdf from google scholar
33814859!8005256!33814859
unlimited free pdf from europmc33814859    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33814859&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33814859      J+Clin+Orthop+Trauma 2021 ; 17 (?): 239-253
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Bioaerosols in orthopedic surgical procedures and implications for clinical practice in the times of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis #MMPMID33814859
  • Sharma S; John R; Patel S; Neradi D; Kishore K; Dhillon MS
  • J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021[Jun]; 17 (?): 239-253 PMID33814859show ga
  • INTRODUCTION: Orthopedic surgical procedures (OSPs) are known to generate bioaerosols, which could result in transmission of infectious diseases. Hence, this review was undertaken to analyse the available evidence on bioaerosols in OSPs, and their significance in COVID-19 transmission. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, bioRxiv and Lancet preprint databases for studies on bioaerosols in OSPs. Random-effects metanalysis was conducted to determine pooled estimates of key bioaerosol characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed by the RoB-SPEO tool; overall strength of evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. RESULTS: 17 studies were included in the systematic review, and 6 in different sets of meta-analyses. The pooled estimate of particle density was 390.74 mug/m(3), Total Particle Count, 6.08 x 10(6)/m(3), and Microbial Air Contamination, 8.08 CFU/m(3). Small sized particles (
  • ?


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box