Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3390/ijerph18052695 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3390/ijerph18052695 33800094!7967422!33800094     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33800094&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Int+J+Environ+Res+Public+Health 2021 ; 18 (5): ? Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33800094|t=2021. Effects of a Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Severe Post-COVID-19 Patients |pdf=|usr=}}{{33800094}} gab.com Text Effects of a Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Severe Post-COVID-19 Patients JO: Int J Environ Res Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33800094 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Severe COVID-19 infection often leads to impairments requiring pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) following the acute phase. Little is known about the efficacy of PR in these patients. We therefore compared post-COVID-19 patients (PG) referred to PR patients with other lung diseases (LG). METHODS: 99 PG were admitted to PR. In a prospective design, the results of PG were collected and compared to the results of LG of 2019 (n = 419) according to Functional Independence Measurement (FIM), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), 6-min walk test (6-MWT), duration of PR, and Feeling Thermometer (FT). RESULTS: According to age, sex, and CIRS, both groups showed no significant differences. The improvements in the 6-MWT in the pre to post comparison were on average 180 (+/-101) meters for PG and 102 (+/-89) meters for LG (p < 0.001). FT showed a significant enhancement for PG of 21 (+/-14) points and for LG of 17 (+/-16) points (p < 0.039), while FIM significantly increased by 11 (+/-10) points in PG and 7 (+/-8) points in LG (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive PR in PG is very effective according to the results in FIM, 6-MWT and FT. Therefore, we recommend PR following severe post-COVID-19 infections. Twit Text FOAVip Effects of a Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Severe Post-COVID-19 Patients ????Int J Environ Res Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33800094 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33800094 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33800094}}</ref> Effects of a Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Severe Post-COVID-19 Patients #MMPMID33800094 Spielmanns M; Pekacka-Egli AM; Schoendorf S; Windisch W; Hermann M Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021[Mar]; 18 (5): ? PMID33800094show ga BACKGROUND: Severe COVID-19 infection often leads to impairments requiring pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) following the acute phase. Little is known about the efficacy of PR in these patients. We therefore compared post-COVID-19 patients (PG) referred to PR patients with other lung diseases (LG). METHODS: 99 PG were admitted to PR. In a prospective design, the results of PG were collected and compared to the results of LG of 2019 (n = 419) according to Functional Independence Measurement (FIM), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), 6-min walk test (6-MWT), duration of PR, and Feeling Thermometer (FT). RESULTS: According to age, sex, and CIRS, both groups showed no significant differences. The improvements in the 6-MWT in the pre to post comparison were on average 180 (+/-101) meters for PG and 102 (+/-89) meters for LG (p < 0.001). FT showed a significant enhancement for PG of 21 (+/-14) points and for LG of 17 (+/-16) points (p < 0.039), while FIM significantly increased by 11 (+/-10) points in PG and 7 (+/-8) points in LG (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive PR in PG is very effective according to the results in FIM, 6-MWT and FT. Therefore, we recommend PR following severe post-COVID-19 infections. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Lung Diseases[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Prospective Studies[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Treatment Outcome[MESH]Effects of a Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Severe Post-COV(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing