Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/ans.16761 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/ans.16761 33792122!8250243!33792122     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33792122&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       ANZ+J+Surg 2021 ; 91 (7-8): 1358-1363 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33792122|t=2021. Consistency of global recommendations regarding open versus laparoscopic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review |pdf=|usr=}}{{33792122}} gab.com Text Consistency of global recommendations regarding open versus laparoscopic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review JO: ANZ J Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33792122 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been worldwide debate regarding whether open surgery should be performed in preference to laparoscopic surgery due to the theoretical higher risk of viral aerosolization by the release of pneumoperitoneum. We aimed to assess the consistency of national and international surgical society recommendations regarding the choice of surgical approach; assess the quality of evidence of viral emission in surgical aerosol; and assess the quality of evidence comparing aerosol generation by different surgical energy devices. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed. Three search strategies were employed. Twenty-eight studies were included in the final analysis and quality appraised. Confidence in review findings was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) tool. RESULTS: Worldwide recommendations regarding open versus laparoscopic surgery are consistent, with a majority recommending that surgical approach is decided on a case-by-case, risk minimization approach. There is limited, low-quality evidence that viral particles can be emitted in surgical aerosol. There is a paucity of literature on the quantity of aerosol produced by different surgical energy devices, and no evidence to support the use of certain surgical instruments to minimize aerosol production. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable consistency among worldwide recommendations regarding the choice of surgical approach, although the evidence base is lacking. To inform clinical recommendations, further research examining viral emission, transmission, infectivity and amount of surgical aerosol produced is required. Twit Text FOAVip Consistency of global recommendations regarding open versus laparoscopic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review ????ANZ J Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33792122 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33792122 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33792122}}</ref> Consistency of global recommendations regarding open versus laparoscopic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review #MMPMID33792122 Jacob S; Hameed A; Lam V; Pang TC ANZ J Surg 2021[Jul]; 91 (7-8): 1358-1363 PMID33792122show ga BACKGROUND: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been worldwide debate regarding whether open surgery should be performed in preference to laparoscopic surgery due to the theoretical higher risk of viral aerosolization by the release of pneumoperitoneum. We aimed to assess the consistency of national and international surgical society recommendations regarding the choice of surgical approach; assess the quality of evidence of viral emission in surgical aerosol; and assess the quality of evidence comparing aerosol generation by different surgical energy devices. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed. Three search strategies were employed. Twenty-eight studies were included in the final analysis and quality appraised. Confidence in review findings was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) tool. RESULTS: Worldwide recommendations regarding open versus laparoscopic surgery are consistent, with a majority recommending that surgical approach is decided on a case-by-case, risk minimization approach. There is limited, low-quality evidence that viral particles can be emitted in surgical aerosol. There is a paucity of literature on the quantity of aerosol produced by different surgical energy devices, and no evidence to support the use of certain surgical instruments to minimize aerosol production. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable consistency among worldwide recommendations regarding the choice of surgical approach, although the evidence base is lacking. To inform clinical recommendations, further research examining viral emission, transmission, infectivity and amount of surgical aerosol produced is required. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Laparoscopy[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH]Consistency of global recommendations regarding open versus laparoscop(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing