Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1097/JOM.0000000000002166

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002166
suck pdf from google scholar
33769403!ä!33769403

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid33769403      J+Occup+Environ+Med 2021 ; 63 (4): e184-e186
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Use of Vinegar and Water to Identify COVID-19 Cases During a Workplace Entrance Screening Protocol #MMPMID33769403
  • Kalia N; Moraga JA; Manzanares M; Friede V; Kusti M; Bernacki EJ; Tao XG
  • J Occup Environ Med 2021[Apr]; 63 (4): e184-e186 PMID33769403show ga
  • OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an empirical olfactory test to identify COVID-19 cases during a workplace entrance screening. METHOD: An active screening for olfactory dysfunction using water and vinegar was conducted in April to June 2020 among 4120 meat packing workers in Latin America. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the active olfactory screening examination were 41.2% and 85.3%, respectively, using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests as a gold standard. 10.6% of employees who tested positive for COVID-19 had an olfactory dysfunction as their only symptom. These individuals would not have been identified with standard workplace screening measures including temperature screening. CONCLUSION: Active screening for olfactory dysfunction may serve as a valuable tool to both identify potential COVID-19 infections and exclude those who do not have infection and should be a part of parallel algorithm combined with standard workplace entrance screening procedures.
  • |*Workplace[MESH]
  • |Acetic Acid[MESH]
  • |Anosmia/*diagnosis/physiopathology[MESH]
  • |COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*diagnosis/physiopathology[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Mass Screening/*methods/standards[MESH]
  • |Meat-Packing Industry[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box