Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1136/medethics-2020-106792 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/medethics-2020-106792 33753473!?!33753473 Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33753473&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       J+Med+Ethics 2021 ; ? (?): ? Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33753473|t=2021. Allocating scarce life-saving resources: the proper role of age |pdf=|usr=}}{{33753473}} gab.com Text Allocating scarce life-saving resources: the proper role of age JO: J Med Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33753473 #FOAvip The COVID-19 pandemic has forced clinicians, policy-makers and the public to wrestle with stark choices about who should receive potentially life-saving interventions such as ventilators, ICU beds and dialysis machines if demand overwhelms capacity. Many allocation schemes face the question of whether to consider age. We offer two underdiscussed arguments for prioritising younger patients in allocation policies, which are grounded in prudence and fairness rather than purely in maximising benefits: prioritising one's younger self for lifesaving treatments is prudent from an individual perspective, and prioritising younger patients works to narrow health disparities by giving priority to patients at risk of dying earlier in life, who are more likely to be subject to systemic disadvantage. We then identify some confusions in recent arguments against considering age. Twit Text FOAVip Allocating scarce life-saving resources: the proper role of age ????J Med Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33753473 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33753473 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33753473}}</ref> Allocating scarce life-saving resources: the proper role of age #MMPMID33753473 Persad G; Joffe S J Med Ethics 2021[Mar]; ? (?): ? PMID33753473show ga The COVID-19 pandemic has forced clinicians, policy-makers and the public to wrestle with stark choices about who should receive potentially life-saving interventions such as ventilators, ICU beds and dialysis machines if demand overwhelms capacity. Many allocation schemes face the question of whether to consider age. We offer two underdiscussed arguments for prioritising younger patients in allocation policies, which are grounded in prudence and fairness rather than purely in maximising benefits: prioritising one's younger self for lifesaving treatments is prudent from an individual perspective, and prioritising younger patients works to narrow health disparities by giving priority to patients at risk of dying earlier in life, who are more likely to be subject to systemic disadvantage. We then identify some confusions in recent arguments against considering age. ?Allocating scarce life-saving resources: the proper role of age (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing