Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1177/2055217321997467

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1177/2055217321997467
suck pdf from google scholar
33738110!7934057!33738110
unlimited free pdf from europmc33738110    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33738110&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33738110      Mult+Scler+J+Exp+Transl+Clin 2021 ; 7 (1): 2055217321997467
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Expanded access to multiple sclerosis teleneurology care following the COVID-19 pandemic #MMPMID33738110
  • McGinley MP; Gales S; Rowles W; Wang Z; Hsu WY; Amezcua L; Bove R
  • Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2021[Jan]; 7 (1): 2055217321997467 PMID33738110show ga
  • BACKGROUND: Teleneurology for multiple sclerosis (MS) care was considered feasible, but utilization was limited. OBJECTIVE: To describe how the existing teleneurology populations at two academic MS Centers changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we captured all in-person and teleneurology visits at two academic MS Centers between January 2019 and April 2020. We compared group differences between the Centers, and COVID-related changes using T-, chi-squared Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: 2268 patients completed 2579 teleneurology visits (mean age 48.3 +/- 13.3 years, 72.9% female). Pre-COVID, the Centers' teleneurology populations were similar for age, sex, MS type, and disability level (all p > 0.1), but differed for race (96.5% vs 80.7% white, p
  • ?


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box