Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s10654-021-00735-7 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s10654-021-00735-7 33725291!7961168!33725291     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Eur+J+Epidemiol 2021 ; 36 (2): 143-147 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33725291|t=2021. Arguments about face masks and Covid-19 reflect broader methodologic debates within medical science |pdf=|usr=}}{{33725291}} gab.com Text Arguments about face masks and Covid-19 reflect broader methodologic debates within medical science JO: Eur J Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33725291 #FOAvip There has perhaps been no issue as contentious in Covid-19 as face masks. The most contentious scientific debate has been between those who argue that "there is no scientific evidence", by which they mean that there are no randomized controlled trials (RCTs), versus those who argue that when the evidence is considered together, "the science supports that face coverings save lives". It used to be a 'given' that to decide whether a particular factor, either exogenous or endogenous, can cause a particular disease, and in what order of magnitude, one should consider all reasonably cogent evidence. This approach is being increasingly challenged, both scientifically and politically. The scientific challenge has come from methodologic views that focus on the randomized controlled trial (RCT) as the scientific gold standard, with priority being given, either to evidence from RCTs or to observational studies which closely mimic RCTs. The political challenge has come from various interests calling for the exclusion of epidemiological evidence from consideration by regulatory and advisory committees. Twit Text FOAVip Arguments about face masks and Covid-19 reflect broader methodologic debates within medical science ????Eur J Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33725291 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33725291 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33725291}}</ref> Arguments about face masks and Covid-19 reflect broader methodologic debates within medical science #MMPMID33725291 Pearce N; Vandenbroucke JP Eur J Epidemiol 2021[Feb]; 36 (2): 143-147 PMID33725291show ga There has perhaps been no issue as contentious in Covid-19 as face masks. The most contentious scientific debate has been between those who argue that "there is no scientific evidence", by which they mean that there are no randomized controlled trials (RCTs), versus those who argue that when the evidence is considered together, "the science supports that face coverings save lives". It used to be a 'given' that to decide whether a particular factor, either exogenous or endogenous, can cause a particular disease, and in what order of magnitude, one should consider all reasonably cogent evidence. This approach is being increasingly challenged, both scientifically and politically. The scientific challenge has come from methodologic views that focus on the randomized controlled trial (RCT) as the scientific gold standard, with priority being given, either to evidence from RCTs or to observational studies which closely mimic RCTs. The political challenge has come from various interests calling for the exclusion of epidemiological evidence from consideration by regulatory and advisory committees. |*Masks[MESH] |*Politics[MESH] |*Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic[MESH] |*Research Design[MESH] |COVID-19/*prevention & control[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Arguments about face masks and Covid-19 reflect broader methodologic d(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing