Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1371/journal.pone.0248729

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1371/journal.pone.0248729
suck pdf from google scholar
33725025!7963097!33725025
unlimited free pdf from europmc33725025    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33725025      PLoS+One 2021 ; 16 (3): e0248729
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Accurate point-of-care serology tests for COVID-19 #MMPMID33725025
  • Schuler CF 4th; Gherasim C; O'Shea K; Manthei DM; Chen J; Giacherio D; Troost JP; Baldwin JL; Baker JR Jr
  • PLoS One 2021[]; 16 (3): e0248729 PMID33725025show ga
  • BACKGROUND: As COVID-19 vaccines become available, screening individuals for prior COVID-19 infection and vaccine response in point-of-care (POC) settings has renewed interest. We prospectively screened at-risk individuals for SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid protein antibodies in a POC setting to determine if it was a feasible method to identify antibody from prior infection. METHODS: Three EUA-approved lateral flow antibody assays were performed on POC finger-stick blood and compared with serum and a CLIA nucleocapsid antibody immunoassay. Variables including antibody class, time since PCR, and the assay antigen used were evaluated. RESULTS: 512 subjects enrolled, of which 104 had a COVID-19 history and positive PCR. Only three PCR-positive subjects required hospitalization, with one requiring mechanical ventilation. The POC results correlated well with the immunoassay (93-97% sensitivity) and using serum did not improve the sensitivity or specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Finger-stick, POC COVID-19 antibody testing was highly effective in identifying antibody resulting from prior infections in mildly symptomatic subjects. Using high-complexity serum immunoassays did not improve the screening outcome. Almost all individuals with COVID-19 infection produced detectable antibodies to the virus. POC antibody testing is useful as a screen for prior COVID-19 infection, and should be useful in assessing vaccine response.
  • |*Point-of-Care Systems[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Antibodies, Viral/blood[MESH]
  • |COVID-19 Serological Testing[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*diagnosis/virology[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Immunoassay[MESH]
  • |Immunoglobulin G/blood[MESH]
  • |Immunoglobulin M/blood[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Nucleocapsid/immunology[MESH]
  • |Reagent Kits, Diagnostic[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2/immunology/isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box