Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.3233/HAB-210440

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3233/HAB-210440
suck pdf from google scholar
33720878!ä!33720878

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid33720878      Hum+Antibodies 2021 ; 29 (2): 109-113
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Comparative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays against nucleocapsid and spike antigens #MMPMID33720878
  • Rezaei M; Sadeghi M; Korourian A; Tabarsi P; Porabdollah M; Askari E; Mortaz E; Mahmoudi S; Marjani M; Velayati AA
  • Hum Antibodies 2021[]; 29 (2): 109-113 PMID33720878show ga
  • BACKGROUND: There are few studies to compare antibody response against anti-spike (S) and anti- nucleoprotein (N) SARS-CoV-2. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the IgG antibody production against S and N antigens of the virus and their correlation with the time and severity of the disease. METHODS: The IgG antibodies against S and N antigens of SARS-CoV-2 in serum specimens of 72 symptomatic patients who tested real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction positive for SARS-CoV-2 were detected using the ELISA technique. Different antibody response was compared and the correlation with the time from disease onset and the severity was evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 72 (67%) patients tested positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, while 24 (33%) did not have detectable antibodies. Comparison of antibody levels for N and S antibodies showed that they correlate with each other well (r= 0.81; P< 0.001). However, sensitivity of anti-S SARS-CoV-2 IgG and anti-N SARS-CoV-2 IgG was 30% and 60%, during the first 7 days after symptom onset (r= 0.53; P= 0.111), but increased to 73% and 68% at more than 1-week post symptom onset (r= 0.89, P= 0.111), respectively. Cases with positive IgG response showed a decreased CD8+ T cells percentage compared to the negative IgG groups (26 +/- 14 vs. 58 +/- 32, p= 0.066 in anti-N IgG group and 28 +/- 15 vs. 60 +/- 45, p= 0.004 in anti-S IgG group, respectively). CONCLUSION: Nearly one-third of the confirmed COVID-19 patients had negative serology results. Lower percent positivity at early time points after symptom onset (less than 1 week) was seen using anti-S SARS-COV-2 IgG kit compare to the anti-N SARS-CoV-2 IgG; therefore, clinicians should interpret negative serology results of especially anti-S SARS-CoV-2 IgG with caution.
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/diagnosis/*immunology[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/*immunology[MESH]
  • |Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Flow Cytometry[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Immunoglobulin G/*analysis[MESH]
  • |Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Negative Results[MESH]
  • |Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction[MESH]
  • |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]
  • |Severity of Illness Index[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box