Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1177/11206721211001315

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1177/11206721211001315
suck pdf from google scholar
33719638!?!33719638

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33719638&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33719638      Eur+J+Ophthalmol 2021 ; 31 (6): 3490-3493
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Impact of COVID-19 on keratoconus patients waiting for corneal cross linking #MMPMID33719638
  • Shah H; Pagano L; Vakharia A; Coco G; Gadhvi KA; Kaye SB; Romano V
  • Eur J Ophthalmol 2021[Nov]; 31 (6): 3490-3493 PMID33719638show ga
  • PURPOSE: Royal College of Ophthalmologist recent guidance recommended delaying cross-linking services during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study investigates the effects of such delays in the delivery of cross-linking services in patients with keratoconus progression. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of 46 patients with keratoconus progression, whose cross-linking was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Demographic and clinical details were obtained from assessments on the day of listing, and subsequent review on the day of the procedure. Topographic indices included keratometry of the posterior and anterior corneal surface, maximum keratometry (K(max)), thinnest corneal thickness, ABCD progression and progression based on standard criteria recommendations (1.5 D K(max) & 20 microns thinning). RESULTS: A total of 46 eyes were analysed with an average time between being listed for CXL and having the procedure done was 182 +/- 65 days. The delay due to COVID-19 was of 3 months. In this time period they had a significant worsening of all keratometric indices and lost almost one line of visual acuity (0.19 +/- 0.19 to 0.26 +/- 0.18 LogMAR, p: 0.03). Thirty two eyes (70%) demonstrated progression in accordance with the ABCD progression criteria, while 18 eyes (39%) showed either an increase in K(max) of more than 1.5D or a thinning in corneal thickness of at least 20 mum. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment delay for the keratoconus patients caused further progression and vision worsening. We recommend that corneal collagen crosslinking needs to be considered as a high priority intervention.
  • |*COVID-19[MESH]
  • |*Keratoconus/drug therapy[MESH]
  • |*Photochemotherapy[MESH]
  • |Collagen/therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |Corneal Topography[MESH]
  • |Cross-Linking Reagents/therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |Riboflavin/therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box