Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1093/aje/kwab062 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/aje/kwab062 33712822!7989614!33712822     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Am+J+Epidemiol 2021 ; 190 (6): 1075-1080 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33712822|t=2021. Sheltering in Place and the Likelihood of Nonnatural Death |pdf=|usr=}}{{33712822}} gab.com Text Sheltering in Place and the Likelihood of Nonnatural Death JO: Am J Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33712822 #FOAvip Increasing hospitalizations for COVID-19 in the United States and elsewhere have ignited debate over whether to reinstate shelter-in-place policies adopted early in the pandemic to slow the spread of infection. The debate includes claims that sheltering in place influences deaths unrelated to infection or other natural causes. Testing this claim should improve the benefit/cost accounting that informs choice on reimposing sheltering in place. We used time-series methods to compare weekly nonnatural deaths in California with those in Florida. California was the first state to begin, and among the last to end, sheltering in place, while sheltering began later and ended earlier in Florida. During weeks when California had shelter-in-place orders in effect, but Florida did not, the odds that a nonnatural death occurred in California rather than Florida were 14.4% below expected levels. Sheltering-in-place policies likely reduce mortality from mechanisms unrelated to infection or other natural causes of death. Twit Text FOAVip Sheltering in Place and the Likelihood of Nonnatural Death ????Am J Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33712822 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33712822 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33712822}}</ref> Sheltering in Place and the Likelihood of Nonnatural Death #MMPMID33712822 Catalano R; Glymour MM; Chen YH; Bibbins-Domingo K Am J Epidemiol 2021[Jun]; 190 (6): 1075-1080 PMID33712822show ga Increasing hospitalizations for COVID-19 in the United States and elsewhere have ignited debate over whether to reinstate shelter-in-place policies adopted early in the pandemic to slow the spread of infection. The debate includes claims that sheltering in place influences deaths unrelated to infection or other natural causes. Testing this claim should improve the benefit/cost accounting that informs choice on reimposing sheltering in place. We used time-series methods to compare weekly nonnatural deaths in California with those in Florida. California was the first state to begin, and among the last to end, sheltering in place, while sheltering began later and ended earlier in Florida. During weeks when California had shelter-in-place orders in effect, but Florida did not, the odds that a nonnatural death occurred in California rather than Florida were 14.4% below expected levels. Sheltering-in-place policies likely reduce mortality from mechanisms unrelated to infection or other natural causes of death. |COVID-19/mortality/*prevention & control[MESH] |California/epidemiology[MESH] |Cause of Death/*trends[MESH] |Florida/epidemiology[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Likelihood Functions[MESH] |Quarantine/*statistics & numerical data[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Sheltering in Place and the Likelihood of Nonnatural Death (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing