Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1093/eurpub/ckab019 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/eurpub/ckab019 33693615!7989397!33693615     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Eur+J+Public+Health 2021 ; 31 (3): 619-624 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33693615|t=2021. Exploratory comparison of Healthcare costs and benefits of the UK s Covid-19 response with four European countries |pdf=|usr=}}{{33693615}} gab.com Text Exploratory comparison of Healthcare costs and benefits of the UK s Covid-19 response with four European countries JO: Eur J Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33693615 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: In responding to Covid-19, governments have tried to balance protecting health while minimizing gross domestic product (GDP) losses. We compare health-related net benefit (HRNB) and GDP losses associated with government responses of the UK, Ireland, Germany, Spain and Sweden from UK healthcare payer perspective. METHODS: We compared observed cases, hospitalizations and deaths under 'mitigation' to modelled events under 'no mitigation' to 20 July 2020. We thus calculated healthcare costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and HRNB at pound20,000/QALY saved by each country. On per population (i.e. per capita) basis, we compared HRNB with forecast reductions in 2020 GDP growth (overall or compared with Sweden as minimal mitigation country) and qualitatively and quantitatively described government responses. RESULTS: The UK saved 3.17 (0.32-3.65) million QALYs, pound33 (8-38) billion healthcare costs and pound1416 (220-1637) HRNB per capita at pound20,000/QALY. Per capita, this is comparable to pound1455 GDP loss using Sweden as comparator and offsets 46.1 (7.1-53.2)% of total pound3075 GDP loss. Germany, Spain, and Sweden had greater HRNB per capita. These also offset a greater percentage of total GDP losses per capita. Ireland fared worst on both measures. Countries with more mask wearing, testing, and population susceptibility had better outcomes. Highest stringency responses did not appear to have best outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our exploratory analysis indicates the benefit of government Covid-19 responses may outweigh their economic costs. The extent that HRNB offset economic losses appears to relate to population characteristics, testing levels, and mask wearing, rather than response stringency. Twit Text FOAVip Exploratory comparison of Healthcare costs and benefits of the UK s Covid-19 response with four European countries ????Eur J Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33693615 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33693615 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33693615}}</ref> Exploratory comparison of Healthcare costs and benefits of the UK s Covid-19 response with four European countries #MMPMID33693615 Thom H; Walker J; Vickerman P; Hollingworth W Eur J Public Health 2021[Jul]; 31 (3): 619-624 PMID33693615show ga BACKGROUND: In responding to Covid-19, governments have tried to balance protecting health while minimizing gross domestic product (GDP) losses. We compare health-related net benefit (HRNB) and GDP losses associated with government responses of the UK, Ireland, Germany, Spain and Sweden from UK healthcare payer perspective. METHODS: We compared observed cases, hospitalizations and deaths under 'mitigation' to modelled events under 'no mitigation' to 20 July 2020. We thus calculated healthcare costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and HRNB at pound20,000/QALY saved by each country. On per population (i.e. per capita) basis, we compared HRNB with forecast reductions in 2020 GDP growth (overall or compared with Sweden as minimal mitigation country) and qualitatively and quantitatively described government responses. RESULTS: The UK saved 3.17 (0.32-3.65) million QALYs, pound33 (8-38) billion healthcare costs and pound1416 (220-1637) HRNB per capita at pound20,000/QALY. Per capita, this is comparable to pound1455 GDP loss using Sweden as comparator and offsets 46.1 (7.1-53.2)% of total pound3075 GDP loss. Germany, Spain, and Sweden had greater HRNB per capita. These also offset a greater percentage of total GDP losses per capita. Ireland fared worst on both measures. Countries with more mask wearing, testing, and population susceptibility had better outcomes. Highest stringency responses did not appear to have best outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our exploratory analysis indicates the benefit of government Covid-19 responses may outweigh their economic costs. The extent that HRNB offset economic losses appears to relate to population characteristics, testing levels, and mask wearing, rather than response stringency. |*COVID-19[MESH] |Cost-Benefit Analysis[MESH] |Europe[MESH] |Germany[MESH] |Health Care Costs[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Ireland[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Spain[MESH] |Sweden[MESH]Exploratory comparison of Healthcare costs and benefits of the UK s Co(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing