Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.005 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.005 33691153!7937325!33691153     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 267.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 267.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Clin+Epidemiol 2021 ; 135 (ä): 125-135 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33691153|t=2021. The methodological quality is insufficient in clinical practice guidelines in the context of COVID-19: systematic review |pdf=|usr=}}{{33691153}} gab.com Text The methodological quality is insufficient in clinical practice guidelines in the context of COVID-19: systematic review JO: J Clin Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33691153 #FOAvip OBJECTIVES: The number of published clinical practice guidelines related to COVID-19 has rapidly increased. This study explored if basic methodological standards of guideline development have been met in the published clinical practice guidelines related to COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Rapid systematic review from February 1 until April 27, 2020 using MEDLINE [PubMed], CINAHL [Ebsco], Trip and manual search, including all types of healthcare workers providing any kind of healthcare to any patient population in any setting. RESULTS: There were 1342 titles screened and 188 guidelines included. The highest average AGREE II domain score was 89% for scope and purpose, the lowest for rigor of development (25%). Only eight guidelines (4%) were based on a systematic literature search and a structured consensus process by representative experts (classified as the highest methodological quality). The majority (156; 83%) was solely built on an informal expert consensus. A process for regular updates was described in 27 guidelines (14%). Patients were included in the development of only one guideline. CONCLUSION: Despite clear scope, most publications fell short of basic methodological standards of guideline development. Clinicians should use guidelines that include up-to-date information, were informed by stakeholder involvement, and employed rigorous methodologies. Twit Text FOAVip The methodological quality is insufficient in clinical practice guidelines in the context of COVID-19: systematic review ????J Clin Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33691153 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33691153 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33691153}}</ref> The methodological quality is insufficient in clinical practice guidelines in the context of COVID-19: systematic review #MMPMID33691153 Stamm TA; Andrews MR; Mosor E; Ritschl V; Li LC; Ma JK; Campo-Arias A; Baker S; Burton NW; Eghbali M; Fernandez N; Ferreira RJO; Gabler G; Makri S; Mintz S; Moe RH; Morasso E; Murphy SL; Ntuli S; Omara M; Simancas-Pallares MA; Horonieff J; Gartlehner G J Clin Epidemiol 2021[Jul]; 135 (ä): 125-135 PMID33691153show ga OBJECTIVES: The number of published clinical practice guidelines related to COVID-19 has rapidly increased. This study explored if basic methodological standards of guideline development have been met in the published clinical practice guidelines related to COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Rapid systematic review from February 1 until April 27, 2020 using MEDLINE [PubMed], CINAHL [Ebsco], Trip and manual search, including all types of healthcare workers providing any kind of healthcare to any patient population in any setting. RESULTS: There were 1342 titles screened and 188 guidelines included. The highest average AGREE II domain score was 89% for scope and purpose, the lowest for rigor of development (25%). Only eight guidelines (4%) were based on a systematic literature search and a structured consensus process by representative experts (classified as the highest methodological quality). The majority (156; 83%) was solely built on an informal expert consensus. A process for regular updates was described in 27 guidelines (14%). Patients were included in the development of only one guideline. CONCLUSION: Despite clear scope, most publications fell short of basic methodological standards of guideline development. Clinicians should use guidelines that include up-to-date information, were informed by stakeholder involvement, and employed rigorous methodologies. |COVID-19/*therapy[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Practice Guidelines as Topic/*standards[MESH]The methodological quality is insufficient in clinical practice guidel(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing